Comparing winter distribution and harvest rates of transmitter‐marked and banded‐only mallards in western Tennessee

Abstract The miniaturization of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) transmitters is providing insights into the ecology and management of migratory bird species at biologically‐relevant spatial scales. However, transmitters and their attachment methods could bias inferred behaviors, demographic rates, and resulting management decisions. We evaluated the effects of external harness‐style GPS transmitters by comparing direct harvest rates, winter dispersal distances, and subsequent harvest distributions of mallards ( Anas platyrhynchos ) equipped with GPS transmitters ( n = 443) to a tarsal banded‐only control group ( n = 1,123) captured in western Tennessee during winters 2019–2022. We found that transmitter‐marked mallards had similar harvest rates, winter dispersal distances, and harvest distributions as banded‐only mallards. Time between capture and harvest predicted dispersal distances but there was no effect of marker type. Specifically, the average time from capture to harvest was 30 (SE = 2) and 31 (SE = 3) days for banded‐only and transmitter‐marked mallards, respectively. Harvest rate () was only 2.2% greater for transmitter‐marked mallards compared to banded‐only mallards overall, but GPS transmitters affected harvest susceptibility of juveniles ( = 14.5%). Based on harvest rates and dispersal distances between transmitter‐marked and banded‐only cohorts, we suggest 7‐ to 10‐day data censoring periods may be warranted, especially for juveniles, as mallards acclimate to GPS transmitters. Overall, we concluded that modern harness‐style GPS transmitters provided reliable information of wintering mallard space use, movements, and harvest mortality and can be used to inform ecology and management of wintering mallards and other dabbling ducks. Future studies should evaluate effects of harness‐style GPS transmitters for other species and during different portions of dabbling ducks' life cycle, such as migration or nesting, when they may experience greater adverse effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1554
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing winter distribution and harvest rates of transmitter‐marked and banded‐only mallards in western Tennessee

Cory J. Highway, Jamie C. Feddersen, Bradley S. Cohen, Heath M. Hagy et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
0.69
article

Comparing winter distribution and harvest rates of transmitter‐marked and banded‐only mallards in western Tennessee

Cory J. Highway, Jamie C. Feddersen, Bradley S. Cohen, Heath M. Hagy, Nicholas M. Masto, Allison C. Keever, Abigail G. Blake‐Bradshaw
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The miniaturization of Global Positioning Systems (GPS) transmitters is providing insights into the ecology and management of migratory bird species at biologically‐relevant spatial scales. However, transmitters and their attachment methods could bias inferred behaviors, demographic rates, and resulting management decisions. We evaluated the effects of external harness‐style GPS transmitters by comparing direct harvest rates, winter dispersal distances, and subsequent harvest distributions of mallards ( Anas platyrhynchos ) equipped with GPS transmitters ( n = 443) to a tarsal banded‐only control group ( n = 1,123) captured in western Tennessee during winters 2019–2022. We found that transmitter‐marked mallards had similar harvest rates, winter dispersal distances, and harvest distributions as banded‐only mallards. Time between capture and harvest predicted dispersal distances but there was no effect of marker type. Specifically, the average time from capture to harvest was 30 (SE = 2) and 31 (SE = 3) days for banded‐only and transmitter‐marked mallards, respectively. Harvest rate () was only 2.2% greater for transmitter‐marked mallards compared to banded‐only mallards overall, but GPS transmitters affected harvest susceptibility of juveniles ( = 14.5%). Based on harvest rates and dispersal distances between transmitter‐marked and banded‐only cohorts, we suggest 7‐ to 10‐day data censoring periods may be warranted, especially for juveniles, as mallards acclimate to GPS transmitters. Overall, we concluded that modern harness‐style GPS transmitters provided reliable information of wintering mallard space use, movements, and harvest mortality and can be used to inform ecology and management of wintering mallards and other dabbling ducks. Future studies should evaluate effects of harness‐style GPS transmitters for other species and during different portions of dabbling ducks' life cycle, such as migration or nesting, when they may experience greater adverse effects.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 48(4)
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Tennessee Technological University (US)
Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited Canada, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.