A novel automated pipeline to assess MR spectroscopy quality control: Comparing current standards and manual assessment
Standard quantitative metrics may not account for all DQC artifacts as they are not monotonic to the manual ratings. However, manual ratings are labor intensive, subjective, and irreproducible. VECTORS addresses these issues and should be used in conjunction with standard quantitative metrics.
Authors
- Zhou Lan
- Julie M. Joyce (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-7999)
- Inga Katharina Koerte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1281-9286)
- Alexander Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-880X)
- Skyler McComas
- Luisa Sophie Schuhmacher
- Bodhi Beroukhim
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Neuroimaging
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.13246
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.40
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- European Research Council