Reward processing deficits arise early in familial frontotemporal dementia

Reward processing involves evaluation of stimuli to inform what an individual works to pursue or avoid. Patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) often display reward processing changes, including insensitivity to aversive stimuli. It is unknown how early in the disease course reward changes are detectable. We recruited mutation positive (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and negative members of families with known mutations in progranulin (<i>GRN</i>), microtubule-associated protein tau (<i>MAPT</i>) and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (<i>C9orf72</i>). The sample included 4 groups: asymptomatic non-carriers (<i>n</i> = 34), asymptomatic carriers [Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 0, <i>n</i> = 16], mildly symptomatic carriers (CDR 0.5, <i>n</i> = 10) and bvFTD (sporadic and genetic, <i>n</i> = 45). A series of tasks utilized pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral olfactants to probe reward consumption and effort to obtain reward. A group by valence interaction showed unpleasant scent ratings were more positive in groups with greater disease severity [χ<sup>2</sup>(6) = 87.983, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Mildly symptomatic carriers showed a small difference in ratings of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli, similar to bvFTD. In an effort task, where participants chose to avoid or receive scents, mildly symptomatic carriers and bvFTD chose to smell unpleasant scents more frequently than asymptomatic groups, with mildly symptomatic carriers exceeding bvFTD in their frequency of choosing to smell unpleasant scents. In this same task, motivated effort, determined by rate of button press, determined success at obtaining or avoiding scents. Success rate, calculated based on the number of responses where participants' button presses exceeded an individual threshold set in a practice trial, differed across groups (<i>p</i> = 0.048), driven by mildly symptomatic carriers, who were consistently unsuccessful. There was a group difference in variability in button press rate across trials (<i>p</i> = 0.007), driven by mildly symptomatic carriers who showed less varied effort between scents. These findings suggest alterations to reward functioning can be detected early in bvFTD, even before meeting diagnostic criteria. These results may aid in identifying distinctive, initial reward changes in bvFTD that can facilitate early and accurate diagnosis and inspire efforts to identify anatomic underpinnings of early symptomatic changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1491972
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reward processing deficits arise early in familial frontotemporal dementia

Samir Datta, Joel H. Kramer, Andrzej Sokołowski, Bruce L. Miller et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
0.37
article

Reward processing deficits arise early in familial frontotemporal dementia

Samir Datta, Joel H. Kramer, Andrzej Sokołowski, Bruce L. Miller, Emily Hardy, Noah G. Cryns, David C. Perry, Virginia E. Sturm, Howard J. Rosen, Ashlin R. K. Roy, Adam L. Boxer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reward processing involves evaluation of stimuli to inform what an individual works to pursue or avoid. Patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) often display reward processing changes, including insensitivity to aversive stimuli. It is unknown how early in the disease course reward changes are detectable. We recruited mutation positive (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and negative members of families with known mutations in progranulin (<i>GRN</i>), microtubule-associated protein tau (<i>MAPT</i>) and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (<i>C9orf72</i>). The sample included 4 groups: asymptomatic non-carriers (<i>n</i> = 34), asymptomatic carriers [Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 0, <i>n</i> = 16], mildly symptomatic carriers (CDR 0.5, <i>n</i> = 10) and bvFTD (sporadic and genetic, <i>n</i> = 45). A series of tasks utilized pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral olfactants to probe reward consumption and effort to obtain reward. A group by valence interaction showed unpleasant scent ratings were more positive in groups with greater disease severity [χ<sup>2</sup>(6) = 87.983, <i>p</i> < 0.001]. Mildly symptomatic carriers showed a small difference in ratings of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli, similar to bvFTD. In an effort task, where participants chose to avoid or receive scents, mildly symptomatic carriers and bvFTD chose to smell unpleasant scents more frequently than asymptomatic groups, with mildly symptomatic carriers exceeding bvFTD in their frequency of choosing to smell unpleasant scents. In this same task, motivated effort, determined by rate of button press, determined success at obtaining or avoiding scents. Success rate, calculated based on the number of responses where participants' button presses exceeded an individual threshold set in a practice trial, differed across groups (<i>p</i> = 0.048), driven by mildly symptomatic carriers, who were consistently unsuccessful. There was a group difference in variability in button press rate across trials (<i>p</i> = 0.007), driven by mildly symptomatic carriers who showed less varied effort between scents. These findings suggest alterations to reward functioning can be detected early in bvFTD, even before meeting diagnostic criteria. These results may aid in identifying distinctive, initial reward changes in bvFTD that can facilitate early and accurate diagnosis and inspire efforts to identify anatomic underpinnings of early symptomatic changes.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 18
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Larry L. Hillblom Foundation, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.