Challenges and Opportunities for Collaboration Between Academic Biobanks and Industry: Results of an International Survey of Academic Biobanks

<b><i>Aim of the Survey:</i></b> When it comes to collaboration between academic biobanks and the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry, the criteria for effective collaborations are still unclear. Researchers in industry and academic biobanks can have different incentives and requirements that the other party is often not familiar with. This survey was conducted in an attempt to increase understanding of these fundamental knowledge gaps that may be obstacles to optimal collaboration between academia and industry. <b><i>Key Findings from the Survey:</i></b> There were 53 total respondents. Although this was a global survey, most respondents (<i>n</i> = 29) were from North America, likely reflecting overall investment in research in this region and possibly increased interactions between academia and industry as well. Most respondent academic biobanks collect multiple sample types with most (>90%) collecting both biofluids (including blood) and tissue. Most of the participating academic biobanks were aware that they were not (35%), or only partially (35%), using the full potential of their inventory. One option for increasing utilization rates is by collaborating with industry partners. The main issues when working with industry were perceived to be a combination of challenges including contractual (55%), consent restrictions (45%), timelines (41%), or time pressure (36%). Time taken to put agreements together was also a significant hurdle (54%), together with the industry's administrative requirements (36%). <b><i>Brief Conclusions from the Survey:</i></b> To take advantage of opportunities for joint collaboration, it is essential that the parties involved build trust. The first step is to understand the different requirements and needs of the other party and to establish efficient structures for joint cooperation. This survey has highlighted key areas to be addressed as the next steps for strengthening bonds between academic biobanks and industry partners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2023.0156
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Opportunities for Collaboration Between Academic Biobanks and Industry: Results of an International Survey of Academic Biobanks

Daniel Simeon‐Dubach, Suenne Orth, Wohaib Hasan, Vanessa Fonseca Tumilasci et al.
2 citations
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.09
article

Challenges and Opportunities for Collaboration Between Academic Biobanks and Industry: Results of an International Survey of Academic Biobanks

Daniel Simeon‐Dubach, Suenne Orth, Wohaib Hasan, Vanessa Fonseca Tumilasci, Peter Sebbel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Aim of the Survey:</i></b> When it comes to collaboration between academic biobanks and the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry, the criteria for effective collaborations are still unclear. Researchers in industry and academic biobanks can have different incentives and requirements that the other party is often not familiar with. This survey was conducted in an attempt to increase understanding of these fundamental knowledge gaps that may be obstacles to optimal collaboration between academia and industry. <b><i>Key Findings from the Survey:</i></b> There were 53 total respondents. Although this was a global survey, most respondents (<i>n</i> = 29) were from North America, likely reflecting overall investment in research in this region and possibly increased interactions between academia and industry as well. Most respondent academic biobanks collect multiple sample types with most (>90%) collecting both biofluids (including blood) and tissue. Most of the participating academic biobanks were aware that they were not (35%), or only partially (35%), using the full potential of their inventory. One option for increasing utilization rates is by collaborating with industry partners. The main issues when working with industry were perceived to be a combination of challenges including contractual (55%), consent restrictions (45%), timelines (41%), or time pressure (36%). Time taken to put agreements together was also a significant hurdle (54%), together with the industry's administrative requirements (36%). <b><i>Brief Conclusions from the Survey:</i></b> To take advantage of opportunities for joint collaboration, it is essential that the parties involved build trust. The first step is to understand the different requirements and needs of the other party and to establish efficient structures for joint cooperation. This survey has highlighted key areas to be addressed as the next steps for strengthening bonds between academic biobanks and industry partners.

Biopreservation and BiobankingVol. 23(4)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Burlington College (US), Takeda (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.