Psychometric properties of the German version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+)

<b>Background</b>: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) has been recognized as a mental health disorder and was added to the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Despite the same name, both versions of PGD differ in symptom count, content, and diagnostic algorithm. A single instrument to screen for both PGD diagnoses is critical for bereavement research and care. The study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report Plus (TGI-SR+), a self-report measure to assess PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub> symptoms.<b>Methods</b>: Out of a representative sample of the German general population (<i>N</i> = 2509), 1062 reported a significant loss and completed questions about sociodemographic and loss-related variables, the TGI-SR+, and a measure of health-related quality of life.<b>Results</b>: Item analyses demonstrated good item characteristics. Confirmatory factor analyses showed a good fit for two-factor models for PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub>. Omega values demonstrated good internal consistency. In support of concurrent validity, symptoms of PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub> were associated with worse health-related quality of life. In support of known-groups validity, symptoms of PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub> were significantly higher among women, people with a lower educational level, more recently bereaved, those who lost a spouse or child (vs. other person), and those who lost someone due to unnatural causes (vs. natural causes). ROC analyses showed optimal cut-off scores of ≥60 and ≥65 to screen for probable caseness for PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub>, respectively.<b>Limitations</b>: The analyses were based on a cross-sectional design, and data on retest-reliability and predictive validity is missing.<b>Conclusion</b>: Results support the reliability and validity of the German TGI-SR+ as a screening instrument for PGD in research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2024.2421706
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties of the German version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+)

Anette Kersting, Julia Treml, Matthias Morfeld, Viktoria Schmidt et al.
8 citations
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
5.11
article

Psychometric properties of the German version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+)

Anette Kersting, Julia Treml, Matthias Morfeld, Viktoria Schmidt, Elmar Bräehler
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) has been recognized as a mental health disorder and was added to the ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR. Despite the same name, both versions of PGD differ in symptom count, content, and diagnostic algorithm. A single instrument to screen for both PGD diagnoses is critical for bereavement research and care. The study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report Plus (TGI-SR+), a self-report measure to assess PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub> symptoms.<b>Methods</b>: Out of a representative sample of the German general population (<i>N</i> = 2509), 1062 reported a significant loss and completed questions about sociodemographic and loss-related variables, the TGI-SR+, and a measure of health-related quality of life.<b>Results</b>: Item analyses demonstrated good item characteristics. Confirmatory factor analyses showed a good fit for two-factor models for PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub>. Omega values demonstrated good internal consistency. In support of concurrent validity, symptoms of PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub> were associated with worse health-related quality of life. In support of known-groups validity, symptoms of PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub> were significantly higher among women, people with a lower educational level, more recently bereaved, those who lost a spouse or child (vs. other person), and those who lost someone due to unnatural causes (vs. natural causes). ROC analyses showed optimal cut-off scores of ≥60 and ≥65 to screen for probable caseness for PGD<sub>ICD-11</sub> and PGD<sub>DSM-5-TR</sub>, respectively.<b>Limitations</b>: The analyses were based on a cross-sectional design, and data on retest-reliability and predictive validity is missing.<b>Conclusion</b>: Results support the reliability and validity of the German TGI-SR+ as a screening instrument for PGD in research.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 15(1)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
5.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.