The Polemics between Zarifopol and Ibrăileanu. The Battle of Wits

The present paper focuses on the polemic between Paul Zarifopol and Garabet Ibrăileanu, one of the best examples of the polemic of ideas in romanian culture. The paper traces the path of the polemic between the two, considering the appropriate critical methods of analyzing and interpreting literary works, in relation to the specifics given by a tradition of criticism, to the specifics of literature, but also to the local public. Advocating for different aesthetic conceptions, respectively for aesthetic criticism (Zarifopol) and complete criticism (Ibrăileanu), the aim of the paper is to highlight the theories and mind games found in the polemic between the two, carried out under the dome of the passion for truth, of the high intellectual preciousness, on a field in which mutual respect and admiration for great values take precedence.

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Marisiensis Philologia
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62838/amph-2024-0123
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Polemics between Zarifopol and Ibrăileanu. The Battle of Wits

Acta Marisiensis Philologia
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

The Polemics between Zarifopol and Ibrăileanu. The Battle of Wits

article en

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the polemic between Paul Zarifopol and Garabet Ibrăileanu, one of the best examples of the polemic of ideas in romanian culture. The paper traces the path of the polemic between the two, considering the appropriate critical methods of analyzing and interpreting literary works, in relation to the specifics given by a tradition of criticism, to the specifics of literature, but also to the local public. Advocating for different aesthetic conceptions, respectively for aesthetic criticism (Zarifopol) and complete criticism (Ibrăileanu), the aim of the paper is to highlight the theories and mind games found in the polemic between the two, carried out under the dome of the passion for truth, of the high intellectual preciousness, on a field in which mutual respect and admiration for great values take precedence.

Acta Marisiensis PhilologiaVol. 6(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.