Asthma Control According to GINA 2023: Does Changing the Criteria Improve Asthma Control?

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Achieving disease control is the main goal in asthmatic patients in order to prevent future risks and exacerbations. There are several clinical guidelines that set different definitions of asthma control, and these differences may affect management and treatment in many patients. Our aim was to describe asthma control patterns according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2023 in patients considered to have uncontrolled asthma as per previous GINA 2010 guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 1299 patients from the COAS study were analyzed. The COAS study was a cross-sectional multicenter study conducted in routine clinical practice that included patients with uncontrolled asthma according to GINA 2010. These patients were then re-classified using the now updated GINA 2023 asthma control criteria. <b>Results</b>: After applying GINA 2023 control criteria, previously uncontrolled patients were now classified as having controlled asthma in 24.3% of cases and partially controlled asthma in 16.3% of cases. Only 59.4% maintained their previous diagnosis of uncontrolled asthma. ACT in the uncontrolled patients remained similar after re-classification, as did the percentage of active smokers, respiratory allergy, rhinitis, and lung function. <b>Conclusions</b>: Changes in clinical guideline criteria affect the definition of asthma control. When excluding pulmonary function abnormalities in GINA 2023 asthma control criteria, the percentage of controlled patients greatly increased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226646
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asthma Control According to GINA 2023: Does Changing the Criteria Improve Asthma Control?

César Picado, Alfons Torregó, Alberto García, Rocío Casas‐Saucedo et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Asthma and respiratory diseases
0.65
article

Asthma Control According to GINA 2023: Does Changing the Criteria Improve Asthma Control?

César Picado, Alfons Torregó, Alberto García, Rocío Casas‐Saucedo, Ebymar Arismendi, Paula Ribó, Rosa Muñoz‐Cano, Rosa Palomino, Irina Bobolea, Antonio Valero
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Achieving disease control is the main goal in asthmatic patients in order to prevent future risks and exacerbations. There are several clinical guidelines that set different definitions of asthma control, and these differences may affect management and treatment in many patients. Our aim was to describe asthma control patterns according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2023 in patients considered to have uncontrolled asthma as per previous GINA 2010 guidelines. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 1299 patients from the COAS study were analyzed. The COAS study was a cross-sectional multicenter study conducted in routine clinical practice that included patients with uncontrolled asthma according to GINA 2010. These patients were then re-classified using the now updated GINA 2023 asthma control criteria. <b>Results</b>: After applying GINA 2023 control criteria, previously uncontrolled patients were now classified as having controlled asthma in 24.3% of cases and partially controlled asthma in 16.3% of cases. Only 59.4% maintained their previous diagnosis of uncontrolled asthma. ACT in the uncontrolled patients remained similar after re-classification, as did the percentage of active smokers, respiratory allergy, rhinitis, and lung function. <b>Conclusions</b>: Changes in clinical guideline criteria affect the definition of asthma control. When excluding pulmonary function abnormalities in GINA 2023 asthma control criteria, the percentage of controlled patients greatly increased.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(22)
Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Hospital General de Granollers (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.