Why models underestimate West African tropical forest primary productivity

Tropical forests dominate terrestrial photosynthesis, yet there are major contradictions in our understanding due to a lack of field studies, especially outside the tropical Americas. A recent field study indicated that West African forests have among the highest forests gross primary productivity (GPP) yet observed, contradicting models that rank them lower than Amazonian forests. Here, we show possible reasons for this data-model mismatch. We found that biometric GPP measurements are on average 56.3% higher than multiple global GPP products at the study sites. The underestimation of GPP largely disappears when a standard photosynthesis model is informed by local field-measured values of (a) fractional absorbed photosynthetic radiation (fAPAR), and (b) photosynthetic traits. Remote sensing products systematically underestimate fAPAR (33.9% on average at study sites) due to cloud contamination issues. The study highlights the potential widespread underestimation of tropical forests GPP and carbon cycling and hints at the ways forward for model and input data improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53949-0
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why models underestimate West African tropical forest primary productivity

H. Zhang, Yadvinder Singh Malhi, Imma Oliveras Menor, Stephen Adu‐Bredu et al.
18 citations
Nature Communications
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
5.09
article

Why models underestimate West African tropical forest primary productivity

H. Zhang, Yadvinder Singh Malhi, Imma Oliveras Menor, Stephen Adu‐Bredu, Jesús Aguirre‐Gutiérrez, Ruijie Ding, Benjamin David Stocker, I. Colin Prentice, Akwasi Duah‐Gyamfi, Xiongjie Deng, Eleanor R. Thomson, Agne Gvozdevaite, Sam Moore
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Tropical forests dominate terrestrial photosynthesis, yet there are major contradictions in our understanding due to a lack of field studies, especially outside the tropical Americas. A recent field study indicated that West African forests have among the highest forests gross primary productivity (GPP) yet observed, contradicting models that rank them lower than Amazonian forests. Here, we show possible reasons for this data-model mismatch. We found that biometric GPP measurements are on average 56.3% higher than multiple global GPP products at the study sites. The underestimation of GPP largely disappears when a standard photosynthesis model is informed by local field-measured values of (a) fractional absorbed photosynthetic radiation (fAPAR), and (b) photosynthetic traits. Remote sensing products systematically underestimate fAPAR (33.9% on average at study sites) due to cloud contamination issues. The study highlights the potential widespread underestimation of tropical forests GPP and carbon cycling and hints at the ways forward for model and input data improvement.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
University of Bern (CH), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research (CH), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Stockholm Environment Institute (GB), Université de Montpellier (FR), Leverhulme Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), UMR Botanique et Modélisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétations (FR), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (GH), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Imperial College London (GB)
U.S. Department of Energy, Leverhulme Trust, Sight Research UK, University of Oxford, European Commission, Office of Science, Natural Environment Research Council, Biological and Environmental Research
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.