Auctioning Long-Term Projects under Financial Constraints

Abstract We consider a procurement auction for the provision of a basic service to which an add-on must later be appended. Potential providers are symmetric, have private information on their cost for the basic service and the winning firm must also implement the add-on. To finance value-enhancing activities related to the add-on, this firm may need extra funding by outside financiers. Nonverifiable effort related to these activities creates a moral hazard problem which makes the firm’s payoff function for the second period concave in returns over the relevant range. Concavity has two effects. First, it makes it more attractive to backload payments to facilitate information revelation. Second, uncertainty on the cost of the add-on introduces a background risk which requires a risk premium. In this context, we characterize the optimal intertemporal structure of payments to the winning firm, equilibrium bidding behaviour and reserve prices for a first-price auction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae106
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auctioning Long-Term Projects under Financial Constraints

Malin Arve, David Martimort
2 citations
The Review of Economic Studies
Auction Theory and Applications
0.98
article

Auctioning Long-Term Projects under Financial Constraints

Malin Arve, David Martimort
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We consider a procurement auction for the provision of a basic service to which an add-on must later be appended. Potential providers are symmetric, have private information on their cost for the basic service and the winning firm must also implement the add-on. To finance value-enhancing activities related to the add-on, this firm may need extra funding by outside financiers. Nonverifiable effort related to these activities creates a moral hazard problem which makes the firm’s payoff function for the second period concave in returns over the relevant range. Concavity has two effects. First, it makes it more attractive to backload payments to facilitate information revelation. Second, uncertainty on the cost of the add-on introduces a background risk which requires a risk premium. In this context, we characterize the optimal intertemporal structure of payments to the winning firm, equilibrium bidding behaviour and reserve prices for a first-price auction.

The Review of Economic StudiesVol. 92(5)
Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR), Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Auction Theory and Applications
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.