EFFECTIVENESS OF SENSORY-TARGETED ANKLE REHABILITATION STRATEGIES VERSUS PROPRIOCEPTIVE TRAINING IN IMPROVING ANKLE FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE AMONG ADULTS WITH CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY. A QUICK REVIEW.

Background: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a prevalent condition often resulting from recurrent sprains, negatively impacting daily activities and quality of life. Traditional proprioceptive training enhances motor control, while sensory-targeted ankle rehabilitation strategies (STARS) emphasize sensory feedback for recovery. Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of STARS and proprioceptive training in improving functional performance, balance, and overall ankle function in adults with CAI. Methods: Participants diagnosed with CAI, based on scores of 27 or lower on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Individuals with recent ankle injuries, prior surgeries, or conditions affecting motor skills were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned to either the STARS group or the proprioceptive training group. Measurements of balance, mobility, and functional performance were assessed using the Star Excursion Balance Test, the Functional Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and various hop tests. Results: Data analysis will evaluate significant differences in ankle functional performance, balance, and range of motion between the two groups, highlighting the relative effectiveness of STARS compared to traditional proprioceptive training. Conclusion: This study aims to provide insights into the efficacy of STARS versus proprioceptive training, informing clinical practices regarding optimal rehabilitation strategies for individuals with CAI. Implications: Findings from this research may enhance rehabilitation protocols, aiding individuals with CAI in regaining stability and functional capacity more effectively.