<i>Lawton et al. v. Success Academy Charter Schools, Inc.</i> (2018): Charter School Disciplinary Approaches and Students With Disabilities

By being public entities, charter schools must meet U.S. federal legislative mandates (e.g., Section 504) in providing a free, appropriate public education (FAPE) to students with disabilities—just as their traditional district public school counterparts must do. This legal update reviews a prominent case, Lawton et al. v. Success Academy Charter Schools, Inc. (2018). The case, which eventually settled for $1.1 million plus legal fees (nearly $1.3 million), serves as an illustration of challenges involving students with disabilities in charter schools using no-excuses disciplinary practices. After the review of the case is presented, ramifications for charter schools failing to accommodate students with disabilities in disciplinary matters are considered. Implications for practice are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intervention in School and Clinic
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512241296822
Primary Topic
Legal Issues in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lawton et al. v. Success Academy Charter Schools, Inc. (2018): Charter School Disciplinary Approaches and Students With Disabilities

Luke J. Rapa, Antonis Katsiyannis, Meghan Edwards-Bowyer
Intervention in School and Clinic
Legal Issues in Education
article

Lawton et al. v. Success Academy Charter Schools, Inc. (2018): Charter School Disciplinary Approaches and Students With Disabilities

Luke J. Rapa, Antonis Katsiyannis, Meghan Edwards-Bowyer
article en

Abstract

By being public entities, charter schools must meet U.S. federal legislative mandates (e.g., Section 504) in providing a free, appropriate public education (FAPE) to students with disabilities—just as their traditional district public school counterparts must do. This legal update reviews a prominent case, Lawton et al. v. Success Academy Charter Schools, Inc. (2018). The case, which eventually settled for $1.1 million plus legal fees (nearly $1.3 million), serves as an illustration of challenges involving students with disabilities in charter schools using no-excuses disciplinary practices. After the review of the case is presented, ramifications for charter schools failing to accommodate students with disabilities in disciplinary matters are considered. Implications for practice are also discussed.

Intervention in School and ClinicVol. 60(4)
Clemson University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Legal Issues in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.