Privatization in mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation: Price versus quantity competition

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the issue of privatization in a mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation under Cournot and Bertrand competition. The public firm is assumed to produce a lower‐quality product with lower production costs. We find that under both Bertrand and Cournot competition, privatization is socially desirable (undesirable) if the quality level of the private firm is sufficiently high (low). However, if the quality of the private firm is intermediate, Bertrand and Cournot competition yields opposite policy implications: privatization is desirable under Bertrand competition while undesirable under Cournot competition. Therefore, under Bertrand competition, privatization is more likely to be welfare‐improving than under Cournot competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Economic Theory
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12418
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privatization in mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation: Price versus quantity competition

Yuanzhu Lu, Kangsik Choi
International Journal of Economic Theory
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Privatization in mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation: Price versus quantity competition

Yuanzhu Lu, Kangsik Choi
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the issue of privatization in a mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation under Cournot and Bertrand competition. The public firm is assumed to produce a lower‐quality product with lower production costs. We find that under both Bertrand and Cournot competition, privatization is socially desirable (undesirable) if the quality level of the private firm is sufficiently high (low). However, if the quality of the private firm is intermediate, Bertrand and Cournot competition yields opposite policy implications: privatization is desirable under Bertrand competition while undesirable under Cournot competition. Therefore, under Bertrand competition, privatization is more likely to be welfare‐improving than under Cournot competition.

International Journal of Economic TheoryVol. 21(1)
Pusan National University (KR), University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.