Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere

Abstract. Methodologies for identifying atmospheric oxidized mercury (HgII) compounds, including particulate-bound HgII (HgII(p)) and gaseous oxidized mercury (HgII(g)), by mass spectrometry are currently under development. This method requires preconcentration of HgII for analysis due to high instrument detection limits relative to ambient HgII concentrations. The objective of this work was to identify and test materials for quantitative capture of HgII from the gas phase and to suggest potential surfaces onto which HgII can be collected, thermally desorbed, and characterized using mass spectrometry methods. From the literature, several compounds were identified as potential sorbent materials and tested in the laboratory for uptake of gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0) and HgII(g) (permeated from a HgBr2 salt source). Chitosan, α-Al2O3, and γ-Al2O3 demonstrated HgII(g) capture in ambient air laboratory tests, without sorbing Hg0 under the same conditions. When compared to cation exchange membranes (CEMs), chitosan captured a comparable quantity of HgII(g), while ≤90 % of loaded HgII(g) was recovered from α-Al2O3 and γ-Al2O3. When deployed in the field, the capture efficiency of chitosan decreased compared to CEMs, indicating that environmental conditions impacted the sorption efficiency of this material. The poor recovery of HgII from the tested materials compared to CEMs in the field indicates that further identification and exploration of alternative sorbent materials are required to advance atmospheric mercury chemistry analysis by mass spectrometry methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6397-2024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere

Seth N. Lyman, Mae Sexauer Gustin, Sarrah M. Dunham‐Cheatham, Livia Lown
2 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
0.63
article

Alternate materials for the capture and quantification of gaseous oxidized mercury in the atmosphere

Seth N. Lyman, Mae Sexauer Gustin, Sarrah M. Dunham‐Cheatham, Livia Lown
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Methodologies for identifying atmospheric oxidized mercury (HgII) compounds, including particulate-bound HgII (HgII(p)) and gaseous oxidized mercury (HgII(g)), by mass spectrometry are currently under development. This method requires preconcentration of HgII for analysis due to high instrument detection limits relative to ambient HgII concentrations. The objective of this work was to identify and test materials for quantitative capture of HgII from the gas phase and to suggest potential surfaces onto which HgII can be collected, thermally desorbed, and characterized using mass spectrometry methods. From the literature, several compounds were identified as potential sorbent materials and tested in the laboratory for uptake of gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0) and HgII(g) (permeated from a HgBr2 salt source). Chitosan, α-Al2O3, and γ-Al2O3 demonstrated HgII(g) capture in ambient air laboratory tests, without sorbing Hg0 under the same conditions. When compared to cation exchange membranes (CEMs), chitosan captured a comparable quantity of HgII(g), while ≤90 % of loaded HgII(g) was recovered from α-Al2O3 and γ-Al2O3. When deployed in the field, the capture efficiency of chitosan decreased compared to CEMs, indicating that environmental conditions impacted the sorption efficiency of this material. The poor recovery of HgII from the tested materials compared to CEMs in the field indicates that further identification and exploration of alternative sorbent materials are required to advance atmospheric mercury chemistry analysis by mass spectrometry methods.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 17(21)
Utah State University (US), Binghamton University (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Mercury impact and mitigation studies
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.