Two tools for the science of material effort
This paper discusses the science of material effort from the historical viewpoint.Two general scientific tools: the geometrical descriptive method of Mohr, and the energetic method of Huber are compared and evaluated from the very beginning.Three appropriate stress invariants are taken into account: stress intensity, stress triaxiality and stress shearness.Especially, much attention is devoted to explanation of the stress shearness invariant, which aims at describing the Lode parameter in a more analytical manner.Two different tools of finding a proper yield surface which contains the above mentioned three stress invariants are discussed in the literature perspective.In particular, the three-parameter yield surface, called the Burzyski-Pcherski hypothesis is researched and explained from this new point of view.
Authors
- Janusz Badur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-6926)
- Waldemar Dudda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4083-9479)
- Zdzisław Nowak
- Tomasz Ochrymiuk
Institutions
- Institute of Fundamental Technological Research (PL)
- Institute of Fluid Flow-Machinery (PL)
- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics/Mechanika Teoretyczna i Stosowana
- Published
- 2024-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl/194319
- Primary Topic
- Manufacturing Process and Optimization
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00