An automated computational framework to construct printability maps for additively manufactured metal alloys

In metal additive manufacturing (AM), processing parameters can affect the probability of macroscopic defect formation (lack-of-fusion, keyholing, balling), which can, in turn, jeopardize the final product’s integrity. A printability map classifies regions in the processing space where an alloy can be printed with or without porosity defects. However, the creation of these printability maps is resource-intensive. Previous efforts to generate printability maps have required single-track experiments on pre-alloyed powder, limiting the utilization of these printability maps for the high-throughput design of printable alloys. We address these challenges in the case of Laser Powder Bed Fusion AM (L-PBF-AM) by introducing a fully computational, predictive approach to create printability maps for arbitrary alloys. Our framework uses physics-based thermal models and a variety of defect formation criteria. We benchmark the predictive ability of the proposed framework against literature data for the following commonly printed alloys: 316 Stainless Steel, Inconel 718, Ti-6Al-4V, AF96, and Ni-5Nb. Furthermore, we deploy the framework on NiTi-based Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) as a case study. We scrutinize the accuracy of various sets of defect criteria and use these accuracy measurements to create an uncertainty-aware probabilistic framework capable of predicting the printability maps of arbitrary alloys. This framework has the potential to guide alloy designers to potentially easy-to-print alloys, enabling the co-design of high-performing printable alloys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Computational Materials
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01436-x
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An automated computational framework to construct printability maps for additively manufactured metal alloys

Alaa Elwany, David Shoukr, Brent Vela, Sofia Sheikh et al.
8 citations
npj Computational Materials
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.70
article

An automated computational framework to construct printability maps for additively manufactured metal alloys

Alaa Elwany, David Shoukr, Brent Vela, Sofia Sheikh, Pejman Honarmandi, Raymundo Arróyave, Peter Morcos, İbrahim Karaman
article en
8 citations

Abstract

In metal additive manufacturing (AM), processing parameters can affect the probability of macroscopic defect formation (lack-of-fusion, keyholing, balling), which can, in turn, jeopardize the final product’s integrity. A printability map classifies regions in the processing space where an alloy can be printed with or without porosity defects. However, the creation of these printability maps is resource-intensive. Previous efforts to generate printability maps have required single-track experiments on pre-alloyed powder, limiting the utilization of these printability maps for the high-throughput design of printable alloys. We address these challenges in the case of Laser Powder Bed Fusion AM (L-PBF-AM) by introducing a fully computational, predictive approach to create printability maps for arbitrary alloys. Our framework uses physics-based thermal models and a variety of defect formation criteria. We benchmark the predictive ability of the proposed framework against literature data for the following commonly printed alloys: 316 Stainless Steel, Inconel 718, Ti-6Al-4V, AF96, and Ni-5Nb. Furthermore, we deploy the framework on NiTi-based Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) as a case study. We scrutinize the accuracy of various sets of defect criteria and use these accuracy measurements to create an uncertainty-aware probabilistic framework capable of predicting the printability maps of arbitrary alloys. This framework has the potential to guide alloy designers to potentially easy-to-print alloys, enabling the co-design of high-performing printable alloys.

npj Computational MaterialsVol. 10(1)
Texas A&M University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, High Performance Research Computing, Texas A and M University, Army Research Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.