Development of brief assessment packages of psychosocial constructs related to doping

<b>Background</b><br/>We aimed to develop brief self-report tools that can be used by anti-doping organizations (ADOs) to evaluate education programs regarding their effects on psychosocial correlates of doping. Current assessment tools are too long for this purpose.<br/><br/><b>Methods</b><br/>In phase 1, we reviewed the literature and selected psychosocial constructs perceived to be amenable to anti-doping education. In phase 2, a survey with these constructs was sent to anti-doping experts (i.e. researchers and representatives of ADOs), who rated their importance and rank ordered them. Following this, a smaller pool of constructs was chosen for phase 3, during which, questionnaires capturing these constructs were distributed to adult athletes and athlete support personnel (ASP) in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>Using data from 307 adult athletes and 296 ASP, we selected the best 2–3 items for scales tapping each construct, via the OASIS package in R. Two questionnaires with 24 (athletes) and 28 (ASP) items, respectively, were formed. The questionnaires assess 11 and 13 different constructs, respectively, and capture diverse aspects such as morality, motivation, perceived benefits, and perceived deterrents relevant to doping.<br/><br/><b>Conclusion</b><br/>The questionnaires provide brief assessments for diverse psychosocial constructs that could be used to evaluate ADO education programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2024.2423753
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of brief assessment packages of psychosocial constructs related to doping

Vassilis Barkoukis, Ian D. Boardley, Anne Marte Pensgaard, Nikos Ntoumanis et al.
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Doping in Sports
article

Development of brief assessment packages of psychosocial constructs related to doping

Vassilis Barkoukis, Ian D. Boardley, Anne Marte Pensgaard, Nikos Ntoumanis, Andréas Ivarsson, J.T. Rivold
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b><br/>We aimed to develop brief self-report tools that can be used by anti-doping organizations (ADOs) to evaluate education programs regarding their effects on psychosocial correlates of doping. Current assessment tools are too long for this purpose.<br/><br/><b>Methods</b><br/>In phase 1, we reviewed the literature and selected psychosocial constructs perceived to be amenable to anti-doping education. In phase 2, a survey with these constructs was sent to anti-doping experts (i.e. researchers and representatives of ADOs), who rated their importance and rank ordered them. Following this, a smaller pool of constructs was chosen for phase 3, during which, questionnaires capturing these constructs were distributed to adult athletes and athlete support personnel (ASP) in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>Using data from 307 adult athletes and 296 ASP, we selected the best 2–3 items for scales tapping each construct, via the OASIS package in R. Two questionnaires with 24 (athletes) and 28 (ASP) items, respectively, were formed. The questionnaires assess 11 and 13 different constructs, respectively, and capture diverse aspects such as morality, motivation, perceived benefits, and perceived deterrents relevant to doping.<br/><br/><b>Conclusion</b><br/>The questionnaires provide brief assessments for diverse psychosocial constructs that could be used to evaluate ADO education programs.

Drugs Education Prevention and PolicyVol. 32(6)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Halmstad University (SE), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO), University of Birmingham (GB)
World Anti-Doping Agency
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.