Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose To combine deep learning and biology-based modeling to predict the response of locally advanced, triple-negative breast cancer before initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a biology-based mathematical model of tumor response to NAC was constructed and calibrated on a patient-specific basis using imaging data from patients enrolled in the MD Anderson A Robust TNBC Evaluation FraMework to Improve Survival trial (ARTEMIS; ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02276443) between April 2018 and May 2021. To relate the calibrated parameters in the biology-based model and pretreatment MRI data, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed. The CNN predictions of the calibrated model parameters were used to estimate tumor response at the end of NAC. CNN performance in the estimations of total tumor volume (TTV), total tumor cellularity (TTC), and tumor status was evaluated. Model-predicted TTC and TTV measurements were compared with MRI-based measurements using the concordance correlation coefficient and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (for predicting pathologic complete response at the end of NAC). Results The study included 118 female patients (median age, 51 years [range, 29-78 years]). For comparison of CNN predicted to measured change in TTC and TTV over the course of NAC, the concordance correlation coefficient values were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.98) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.97), respectively. CNN-predicted TTC and TTV had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.94) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.95) for predicting tumor status at the time of surgery, respectively. Conclusion Deep learning integrated with a biology-based mathematical model showed good performance in predicting the spatial and temporal evolution of a patient's tumor during NAC using only pre-NAC MRI data. <b>Keywords:</b> Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Convolutional Neural Network, Biology-based Mathematical Model <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Clinical trial registration no. NCT02276443 ©RSNA, 2024 See also commentary by Mei and Huang in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240124
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Gaiane M. Rauch, Chengyue Wu, Thomas E. Yankeelov, Jong Bum Son et al.
5 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.02
article

Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Gaiane M. Rauch, Chengyue Wu, Thomas E. Yankeelov, Jong Bum Son, Clinton Yam, Jonathan I. Tamir, Sidharth Kumar, Casey E. Stowers, Zhan Xu, Jingfei Ma
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose To combine deep learning and biology-based modeling to predict the response of locally advanced, triple-negative breast cancer before initiating neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, a biology-based mathematical model of tumor response to NAC was constructed and calibrated on a patient-specific basis using imaging data from patients enrolled in the MD Anderson A Robust TNBC Evaluation FraMework to Improve Survival trial (ARTEMIS; ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02276443) between April 2018 and May 2021. To relate the calibrated parameters in the biology-based model and pretreatment MRI data, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was employed. The CNN predictions of the calibrated model parameters were used to estimate tumor response at the end of NAC. CNN performance in the estimations of total tumor volume (TTV), total tumor cellularity (TTC), and tumor status was evaluated. Model-predicted TTC and TTV measurements were compared with MRI-based measurements using the concordance correlation coefficient and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (for predicting pathologic complete response at the end of NAC). Results The study included 118 female patients (median age, 51 years [range, 29-78 years]). For comparison of CNN predicted to measured change in TTC and TTV over the course of NAC, the concordance correlation coefficient values were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.98) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.97), respectively. CNN-predicted TTC and TTV had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.94) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.95) for predicting tumor status at the time of surgery, respectively. Conclusion Deep learning integrated with a biology-based mathematical model showed good performance in predicting the spatial and temporal evolution of a patient's tumor during NAC using only pre-NAC MRI data. <b>Keywords:</b> Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Convolutional Neural Network, Biology-based Mathematical Model <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Clinical trial registration no. NCT02276443 ©RSNA, 2024 See also commentary by Mei and Huang in this issue.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(1)
Livestrong Foundation (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, Conquer Cancer Foundation, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, University of Texas at Austin, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.