SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury on T2-weighted MRI Scans

Purpose To develop a deep learning tool for the automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary lesions in spinal cord injury (SCI) on T2-weighted MRI scans. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included MRI data acquired between July 2002 and February 2023. The data consisted of T2-weighted MRI scans acquired using different scanner manufacturers with various image resolutions (isotropic and anisotropic) and orientations (axial and sagittal). Patients had different lesion etiologies (traumatic, ischemic, and hemorrhagic) and lesion locations across the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. A deep learning model, SCIseg (which is open source and accessible through the Spinal Cord Toolbox, version 6.2 and above), was trained in a three-phase process involving active learning for the automatic segmentation of intramedullary SCI lesions and the spinal cord. The segmentations from the proposed model were visually and quantitatively compared with those from three other open-source methods (PropSeg, DeepSeg, and contrast-agnostic, all part of the Spinal Cord Toolbox). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare quantitative MRI biomarkers of SCI (lesion volume, lesion length, and maximal axial damage ratio) derived from the manual reference standard lesion masks and biomarkers obtained automatically with SCIseg segmentations. Results The study included 191 patients with SCI (mean age, 48.1 years ± 17.9 [SD]; 142 [74%] male patients). SCIseg achieved a mean Dice score of 0.92 ± 0.07 and 0.61 ± 0.27 for spinal cord and SCI lesion segmentation, respectively. There was no evidence of a difference between lesion length (<i>P</i> = .42) and maximal axial damage ratio (<i>P</i> = .16) computed from manually annotated lesions and the lesion segmentations obtained using SCIseg. Conclusion SCIseg accurately segmented intramedullary lesions on a diverse dataset of T2-weighted MRI scans and automatically extracted clinically relevant lesion characteristics. <b>Keywords:</b> Spinal Cord, Trauma, Segmentation, MR Imaging, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240005
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury on T2-weighted MRI Scans

Julien Cohen‐Adad, Jan Valošek, Simon Schading‐Sassenhausen, Dario Pfyffer et al.
12 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Medical Imaging and Analysis
2.21
article

SCIseg: Automatic Segmentation of Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injury on T2-weighted MRI Scans

Julien Cohen‐Adad, Jan Valošek, Simon Schading‐Sassenhausen, Dario Pfyffer, Patrick Freund, Kenneth A. Weber, Andrew C. Smith, Enamundram Naga Karthik, Lynn Farner
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Purpose To develop a deep learning tool for the automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary lesions in spinal cord injury (SCI) on T2-weighted MRI scans. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included MRI data acquired between July 2002 and February 2023. The data consisted of T2-weighted MRI scans acquired using different scanner manufacturers with various image resolutions (isotropic and anisotropic) and orientations (axial and sagittal). Patients had different lesion etiologies (traumatic, ischemic, and hemorrhagic) and lesion locations across the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. A deep learning model, SCIseg (which is open source and accessible through the Spinal Cord Toolbox, version 6.2 and above), was trained in a three-phase process involving active learning for the automatic segmentation of intramedullary SCI lesions and the spinal cord. The segmentations from the proposed model were visually and quantitatively compared with those from three other open-source methods (PropSeg, DeepSeg, and contrast-agnostic, all part of the Spinal Cord Toolbox). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare quantitative MRI biomarkers of SCI (lesion volume, lesion length, and maximal axial damage ratio) derived from the manual reference standard lesion masks and biomarkers obtained automatically with SCIseg segmentations. Results The study included 191 patients with SCI (mean age, 48.1 years ± 17.9 [SD]; 142 [74%] male patients). SCIseg achieved a mean Dice score of 0.92 ± 0.07 and 0.61 ± 0.27 for spinal cord and SCI lesion segmentation, respectively. There was no evidence of a difference between lesion length (<i>P</i> = .42) and maximal axial damage ratio (<i>P</i> = .16) computed from manually annotated lesions and the lesion segmentations obtained using SCIseg. Conclusion SCIseg accurately segmented intramedullary lesions on a diverse dataset of T2-weighted MRI scans and automatically extracted clinically relevant lesion characteristics. <b>Keywords:</b> Spinal Cord, Trauma, Segmentation, MR Imaging, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(1)
University of Zurich (CH), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), Polytechnique Montréal (CA), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Colorado Denver (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, Boettcher Foundation, European Commission, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky, Canada First Research Excellence Fund, Institut pour la Recherche sur la Moelle épinière et l'Encéphale, Institut de Valorisation des Données, Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada, National Institutes of Health, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.