Robustly learning the Hamiltonian dynamics of a superconducting quantum processor
Precise means of characterizing analog quantum simulators are key to developing quantum simulators capable of beyond-classical computations. Here, we precisely estimate the free Hamiltonian parameters of a superconducting-qubit analog quantum simulator from measured time-series data on up to 14 qubits. To achieve this, we develop a scalable Hamiltonian learning algorithm that is robust against state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors and yields tomographic information about those SPAM errors. The key subroutines are a novel super-resolution technique for frequency extraction from matrix time-series, tensorESPRIT, and constrained manifold optimization. Our learning results verify the Hamiltonian dynamics on a Sycamore processor up to sub-MHz accuracy, and allow us to construct a spatial implementation error map for a grid of 27 qubits. Our results constitute an accurate implementation of a dynamical quantum simulation that is precisely characterized using a new diagnostic toolkit for understanding, calibrating, and improving analog quantum processors.
Authors
- Jens Eisert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-1292)
- Jonáš Fuksa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-2584)
- P. Roushan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-3879)
- Ingo Roth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1191-7442)
- Dominik Hangleiter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-7967)
Institutions
- Google (United States) (US)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE)
- Technology Innovation Institute (AE)
- Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US)
- Joint Quantum Institute (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2024-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52629-3
- Citations
- 10
- Primary Topic
- Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.47
Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- European Commission
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung