Mismatch between lab-generated and field-evolved resistance to transgenic Bt crops in<i>Helicoverpa zea</i>

Transgenic crops producing crystalline (Cry) proteins from the bacterium <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt) have been used extensively to control some major crop pests. However, many populations of the noctuid moth <i>Helicoverpa zea</i>, one of the most important crop pests in the United States, have evolved practical resistance to several Cry proteins including Cry1Ac. Although mutations in single genes that confer resistance to Cry proteins have been identified in lab-selected and gene-edited strains of <i>H. zea</i> and other lepidopteran pests, the genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Cry proteins in <i>H. zea</i> has remained elusive. We used a genomic approach to analyze the genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac in 937 <i>H. zea</i> derived from 17 sites in seven states of the southern United States. We found evidence for extensive gene flow among all populations studied. Field-evolved resistance was not associated with mutations in 20 single candidate genes previously implicated in resistance or susceptibility to Cry proteins in <i>H. zea</i> or other lepidopterans. Instead, resistance in field samples was associated with increased copy number of a cluster of nine trypsin genes. However, trypsin gene amplification occurred in a susceptible sample and not in all resistant samples, implying that this amplification does not always confer resistance and mutations in other genes also contribute to field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac in <i>H. zea</i>. The mismatch between lab-generated and field-evolved resistance in <i>H. zea</i> is unlike other cases of Bt resistance and reflects challenges for managing this pest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2416091121
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Insect Resistance and Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mismatch between lab-generated and field-evolved resistance to transgenic Bt crops inHelicoverpa zea

Andrew W. Legan, Benjamin A. Degain, Jeffrey A. Fabrick, Bruce E. Tabashnik et al.
21 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Insect Resistance and Genetics
4.91
article

Mismatch between lab-generated and field-evolved resistance to transgenic Bt crops inHelicoverpa zea

Andrew W. Legan, Benjamin A. Degain, Jeffrey A. Fabrick, Bruce E. Tabashnik, Carson W. Allan, Yves Carrière, Fei Yang, Luciano Matias Matzkin, Kyle M. Benowitz, David L. Kerns, Xianchun Li, Zoe N. Jensen
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Transgenic crops producing crystalline (Cry) proteins from the bacterium <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> (Bt) have been used extensively to control some major crop pests. However, many populations of the noctuid moth <i>Helicoverpa zea</i>, one of the most important crop pests in the United States, have evolved practical resistance to several Cry proteins including Cry1Ac. Although mutations in single genes that confer resistance to Cry proteins have been identified in lab-selected and gene-edited strains of <i>H. zea</i> and other lepidopteran pests, the genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Cry proteins in <i>H. zea</i> has remained elusive. We used a genomic approach to analyze the genetic basis of field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac in 937 <i>H. zea</i> derived from 17 sites in seven states of the southern United States. We found evidence for extensive gene flow among all populations studied. Field-evolved resistance was not associated with mutations in 20 single candidate genes previously implicated in resistance or susceptibility to Cry proteins in <i>H. zea</i> or other lepidopterans. Instead, resistance in field samples was associated with increased copy number of a cluster of nine trypsin genes. However, trypsin gene amplification occurred in a susceptible sample and not in all resistant samples, implying that this amplification does not always confer resistance and mutations in other genes also contribute to field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac in <i>H. zea</i>. The mismatch between lab-generated and field-evolved resistance in <i>H. zea</i> is unlike other cases of Bt resistance and reflects challenges for managing this pest.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(47)
University of Minnesota (US), Agricultural Research Service (US), University of Arizona (US), U.S. Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (US), Arizona State University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Insect Resistance and Genetics
4.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.