Social Enrichment Improves Affective State and Foraging Behavior Compared to Physical Enrichment, While Maintaining Growth Performance in Broiler Chickens

Environmental enrichment is key for improving the broiler welfare in intensive production systems. This study lasted for 43 days and evaluated the effects of physical and social enrichment on broiler welfare. A total of 96 one-day-old male broilers were divided into two treatments: control treatment, provided with physical enrichment (<i>n</i> = 48) including perches, platforms, and straw bales; and social treatment (<i>n</i> = 48), involving regular positive interactions with a human. The behavioral repertoire, footpad health, taste preferences for sweet and umami compounds, affective states (through tonic immobility and attention bias tests), and growth performance were evaluated. No effects were found for feeding, drinking, locomotion, lying, or standing behaviors, although differences were observed at specific time points: the Social group had more feeding time on day 21 (<i>p</i> = 0.046), while physical treatment showed reductions on days 28 and 35 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Social group showed increased drinking on day 42 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), reduced locomotion (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and increased lying (<i>p</i> = 0.046) on day 42. Foraging was higher in the Social group (<i>p</i> = 0.027), but preening showed no differences. Footpad lesions showed no significant differences. The Control group preferred sucrose 100 mM (<i>p</i> = 0.022), but no preference for MSG 300 mM was observed. With regard to tonic immobility, the Control group showed a tendency towards larger durations (<i>p</i> = 0.078), indicating a potential increase in fearfulness. In the attention bias test, although the freezing behavior increased, the latency to begin feeding was shorter in the Social group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), suggesting an improved affective state. Lastly, no significant differences were observed for any of the growth parameters, including average daily feed intake, average daily gain, feed conversion ratio, or final body weight, indicating that the Social group maintained productivity. This approach provides a practical solution for improving the quality of life for broilers in intensive systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223186
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Enrichment Improves Affective State and Foraging Behavior Compared to Physical Enrichment, While Maintaining Growth Performance in Broiler Chickens

Sergio A. Guzmán-Pino, Daniela Luna, Paloma Cordero, Sofía Herrera-Alcaíno et al.
6 citations
Animals
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
2.05
article

Social Enrichment Improves Affective State and Foraging Behavior Compared to Physical Enrichment, While Maintaining Growth Performance in Broiler Chickens

Sergio A. Guzmán-Pino, Daniela Luna, Paloma Cordero, Sofía Herrera-Alcaíno, Jorge González-Pavez
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Environmental enrichment is key for improving the broiler welfare in intensive production systems. This study lasted for 43 days and evaluated the effects of physical and social enrichment on broiler welfare. A total of 96 one-day-old male broilers were divided into two treatments: control treatment, provided with physical enrichment (<i>n</i> = 48) including perches, platforms, and straw bales; and social treatment (<i>n</i> = 48), involving regular positive interactions with a human. The behavioral repertoire, footpad health, taste preferences for sweet and umami compounds, affective states (through tonic immobility and attention bias tests), and growth performance were evaluated. No effects were found for feeding, drinking, locomotion, lying, or standing behaviors, although differences were observed at specific time points: the Social group had more feeding time on day 21 (<i>p</i> = 0.046), while physical treatment showed reductions on days 28 and 35 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The Social group showed increased drinking on day 42 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), reduced locomotion (<i>p</i> = 0.022), and increased lying (<i>p</i> = 0.046) on day 42. Foraging was higher in the Social group (<i>p</i> = 0.027), but preening showed no differences. Footpad lesions showed no significant differences. The Control group preferred sucrose 100 mM (<i>p</i> = 0.022), but no preference for MSG 300 mM was observed. With regard to tonic immobility, the Control group showed a tendency towards larger durations (<i>p</i> = 0.078), indicating a potential increase in fearfulness. In the attention bias test, although the freezing behavior increased, the latency to begin feeding was shorter in the Social group (<i>p</i> < 0.001), suggesting an improved affective state. Lastly, no significant differences were observed for any of the growth parameters, including average daily feed intake, average daily gain, feed conversion ratio, or final body weight, indicating that the Social group maintained productivity. This approach provides a practical solution for improving the quality of life for broilers in intensive systems.

AnimalsVol. 14(22)
University of Chile (CL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.