Consumers’ response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study

The agricultural sector could benefit from biotechnologies in addressing challenges such as pests, droughts, and food supply issues. Genetically modified (GM) crops have been developed to offer not only economic advantages to farmers but also to contribute positively to the environment, human health, and consumer well-being. However, consumers' hesitancy in buying GM food may stem from societal reactions to how biotechnologies in agriculture have been regulated so far. The legislative debate that led, in early 2024, to the approval of Commission's proposal (COM(2023) 411 final) - aimed at simplifying the authorization process for plants obtained with certain new genomic techniques (NGTs) - has sparkled public discussion in the European Union on the application of biotechnologies in agriculture. This work aims to investigate Italian consumers' acceptance toward GM food. Through data collected from an original survey (<i>N</i> = 564), we tested a) their level of knowledge of GM techniques; b) if they are aware of differences between established techniques based on classical approaches of crossing and selection and more precise biotechnological techniques; c) their propensity to buy GM food, with a specific focus on food safety and environmental sustainability issues. By using a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), starting from three hypotheses, the study highlights a gap in knowledge transfer and, in general, the communication process. This results in widespread misinformation that hinders informed consumer choices. The study also emphasizes consumers' sensitivity to food safety, including environmental issues, but still related to food safety issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GM crops & food
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2024.2417473
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumers’ response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study

Francesca Nocente, Federica Morandi, Federica Demaria, Laura Gazza et al.
5 citations
GM crops & food
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
3.00
article

Consumers’ response to genetically modified food: an Italian case study

Francesca Nocente, Federica Morandi, Federica Demaria, Laura Gazza, Simona Romeo Lironcurti, Alessandra Pesce
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The agricultural sector could benefit from biotechnologies in addressing challenges such as pests, droughts, and food supply issues. Genetically modified (GM) crops have been developed to offer not only economic advantages to farmers but also to contribute positively to the environment, human health, and consumer well-being. However, consumers' hesitancy in buying GM food may stem from societal reactions to how biotechnologies in agriculture have been regulated so far. The legislative debate that led, in early 2024, to the approval of Commission's proposal (COM(2023) 411 final) - aimed at simplifying the authorization process for plants obtained with certain new genomic techniques (NGTs) - has sparkled public discussion in the European Union on the application of biotechnologies in agriculture. This work aims to investigate Italian consumers' acceptance toward GM food. Through data collected from an original survey (<i>N</i> = 564), we tested a) their level of knowledge of GM techniques; b) if they are aware of differences between established techniques based on classical approaches of crossing and selection and more precise biotechnological techniques; c) their propensity to buy GM food, with a specific focus on food safety and environmental sustainability issues. By using a Multinomial Logit Model (MNL), starting from three hypotheses, the study highlights a gap in knowledge transfer and, in general, the communication process. This results in widespread misinformation that hinders informed consumer choices. The study also emphasizes consumers' sensitivity to food safety, including environmental issues, but still related to food safety issues.

GM crops & foodVol. 15(1)
Food Technology Research Unit (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
3.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.