Longitudinal validation of the PROMIS-16 in a sample of adults in the United States with back pain
Results provide between-level support for the longitudinal and predictive validity of the PROMIS-16. Similar average baseline scores and changes over time were observed between PROMIS-16 and PROMIS-29 + 2. Further, average change estimates comparably predicted average change in distal outcomes. This work provides evidence supporting the utility of the PROMIS-16 as a viable, short-profile option for use in clinical and research settings.
Authors
- Anthony Rodriguez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9485-0003)
- Maria Orlando Edelen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1381-1465)
- Ron D. Hays (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-907X)
- Patricia M. Herman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5579-5654)
- Chengbo Zeng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-1115)
Institutions
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- RAND Corporation (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Quality of Life Research
- Published
- 2024-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03826-6
- Primary Topic
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- RAND Corporation
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health