Risk factors for daytime sleepiness in a population-based sample

The study analyzed factors associated with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in the middle-aged general population. The SCAPIS (Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study) cohort (n=27,976; F:M 1:1; mean age 57.5±4.3SD yrs) assessed sleep related factors (duration and subjective quality) along with anthropometric, lifestyle, socioeconomic factors as well as somatic disease and phycological distress. EDS was assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. Logistic regression modelling was used to identify predictors of EDS defined as ESS score >10 in the population. The population attributable fraction (PAF) for EDS risk factors was calculated to estimate the proportional reduction of EDS in the study population if exposure to these risk factors were reduced to an ideal level. Sleep duration was related to EDS with increasing ORs for decreasing hours of sleep (7h: OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.02-1.3 to ≤4h: 1.9; 1.4-2.5; reference 8h). Insomnia (1.3; 1.2-1.43), poor sleep quality (1.2; 1.04-1.4), snoring (1.5; 1.4-1.6) and nocturnal reflux (1.5; 1.21-1.8), were identified as independent risk factors for EDS. Psychological distress such as sadness/depression (1.2; 1.1-1.3), stress (some stress: 1.4; 1.1-1.7 to constant stress 5yrs: 1.7; 1.3-2.2) and perceived control (lowest quartile: 1.7; 1.6-2.0) were also identified as independent predictors of EDS. Strongest PAF´s for the risk of EDS included psychological factors and shortened sleep time. Daytime sleepiness is multifactorial showing relationship with short sleep, impaired sleep quality and psychological distress. Increasing sleep duration and improving psychological distress levels on the societal level are likely the most important measures to improve daytime sleepiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa465
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors for daytime sleepiness in a population-based sample

Hanan A. Tanash, Jenny Theorell‐Haglöw, Ludger Grote, Karl A. Franklin et al.
Epidemiology
Sleep and related disorders
article

Risk factors for daytime sleepiness in a population-based sample

Hanan A. Tanash, Jenny Theorell‐Haglöw, Ludger Grote, Karl A. Franklin, Martin Ulander, Jonas Spaak
article en

Abstract

The study analyzed factors associated with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in the middle-aged general population. The SCAPIS (Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study) cohort (n=27,976; F:M 1:1; mean age 57.5±4.3SD yrs) assessed sleep related factors (duration and subjective quality) along with anthropometric, lifestyle, socioeconomic factors as well as somatic disease and phycological distress. EDS was assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. Logistic regression modelling was used to identify predictors of EDS defined as ESS score >10 in the population. The population attributable fraction (PAF) for EDS risk factors was calculated to estimate the proportional reduction of EDS in the study population if exposure to these risk factors were reduced to an ideal level. Sleep duration was related to EDS with increasing ORs for decreasing hours of sleep (7h: OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.02-1.3 to ≤4h: 1.9; 1.4-2.5; reference 8h). Insomnia (1.3; 1.2-1.43), poor sleep quality (1.2; 1.04-1.4), snoring (1.5; 1.4-1.6) and nocturnal reflux (1.5; 1.21-1.8), were identified as independent risk factors for EDS. Psychological distress such as sadness/depression (1.2; 1.1-1.3), stress (some stress: 1.4; 1.1-1.7 to constant stress 5yrs: 1.7; 1.3-2.2) and perceived control (lowest quartile: 1.7; 1.6-2.0) were also identified as independent predictors of EDS. Strongest PAF´s for the risk of EDS included psychological factors and shortened sleep time. Daytime sleepiness is multifactorial showing relationship with short sleep, impaired sleep quality and psychological distress. Increasing sleep duration and improving psychological distress levels on the societal level are likely the most important measures to improve daytime sleepiness.

Epidemiology
Linköping University (SE), Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Danderyds sjukhus (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Glanrhyd Hospital (GB), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Linköping University Hospital (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.