Post-Hospital COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R): A randomised controlled trial

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Patients following hospitalisation with COVID-19 experience on-going symptoms that reduce exercise capacity. We hypothesised that rehabilitation (supervised or digital) would support recovery and improve exercise capacity compared to usual care in adults with Long COVID. <bold>Methods:</bold> Adults with Long COVID following hospitalisation were recruited from two UK NHS hospitals. Participants were randomised to receive either eight weeks of supervised (twice weekly) or digital rehabilitation, or usual care. Rehabilitation comprised of individually prescribed aerobic and strength exercise, and education sessions. The primary outcome was exercise capacity measured using the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) distance (metres). Intention to treat analysis compared supervised rehabilitation to usual care, and digital rehabilitation to usual care. 44 participants were required per group to show a between group change of 50m. <bold>Results:</bold> Of the 181 participants were recruited (mean[SD] age 59[12]years, length of stay 11[19]days, n=99(55%) male), 149 participants completed the trial. The ISWT improved in the supervised and digital rehabilitation groups from mean[SD] 285[248]m to 312[252]m, and 353[227]m to 388[214]m, respectively, but no improvements were seen in usual care 328[201]m to 330[198]m. Improvements for supervised and digital interventions compared with usual care were mean[SD] change 52.3[16.7]m p<0.01 and 33.6[16.8]m p=0.04, respectively. These improvements are comparable to established minimal clinical important differences (35m). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Supervised and digital rehabilitation improved exercise capacity compared to usual care in previously hospitalised adults with Long COVID.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.oa3668
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Post-Hospital COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R): A randomised controlled trial

Molly M Baldwin, Amisha Singapuri, Sally J. Singh, Christopher Edward Brightling et al.
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Post-Hospital COVID-19 Rehabilitation (PHOSP-R): A randomised controlled trial

Molly M Baldwin, Amisha Singapuri, Sally J. Singh, Christopher Edward Brightling, Louise V. Wain, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Rachael A Evans, Neil J. Greening, Carlos Echevarria, Enya Daynes
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Patients following hospitalisation with COVID-19 experience on-going symptoms that reduce exercise capacity. We hypothesised that rehabilitation (supervised or digital) would support recovery and improve exercise capacity compared to usual care in adults with Long COVID. <bold>Methods:</bold> Adults with Long COVID following hospitalisation were recruited from two UK NHS hospitals. Participants were randomised to receive either eight weeks of supervised (twice weekly) or digital rehabilitation, or usual care. Rehabilitation comprised of individually prescribed aerobic and strength exercise, and education sessions. The primary outcome was exercise capacity measured using the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) distance (metres). Intention to treat analysis compared supervised rehabilitation to usual care, and digital rehabilitation to usual care. 44 participants were required per group to show a between group change of 50m. <bold>Results:</bold> Of the 181 participants were recruited (mean[SD] age 59[12]years, length of stay 11[19]days, n=99(55%) male), 149 participants completed the trial. The ISWT improved in the supervised and digital rehabilitation groups from mean[SD] 285[248]m to 312[252]m, and 353[227]m to 388[214]m, respectively, but no improvements were seen in usual care 328[201]m to 330[198]m. Improvements for supervised and digital interventions compared with usual care were mean[SD] change 52.3[16.7]m p<0.01 and 33.6[16.8]m p=0.04, respectively. These improvements are comparable to established minimal clinical important differences (35m). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Supervised and digital rehabilitation improved exercise capacity compared to usual care in previously hospitalised adults with Long COVID.

Newcastle City Council (GB), Northumbria University (GB), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.