Comparison of Five Prognostic Scores for Association with Mortality in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy, and treatment is based on survival prediction. The aim of our study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL, and NLR scores for survival in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients diagnosed with MPE were included in the study and examined retrospectively. All scores were calculated at the time of the diagnosis of MPE. Lung cancer patients who have MPE were admitted to the study, and the 30-day, six-month, and one-year mortality rates were taken as the endpoints. A total of 180 patients were examined; 138 (77%) were male, and the mean age was 65 ± 11 years. At 30 days of mortality, the values of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76–0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63–0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17–0.38). At six months and one year, the order of these AUCs was similar. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA3801/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>The AUCs for the AL and pNLR were not statistically significant at any time. The Cox regression analyses showed that at six months, the LENT score is a better predictor than PROMISE (p = 0.001) and RECLS (p = 0.02). At one year, the LENT score is a better predictor than PROMISE (p = 0.001), and there is no difference between the LENT and RECLS scores (p=0.64). The present study is the first that compares these five scores. We observed that LENT and RECLS scores are prognostic for long-term mortality in lung cancer patients with MPE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.oa3801
Primary Topic
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Five Prognostic Scores for Association with Mortality in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Merve Ayık Türk, Gülru Polat, Berna Kömürcüoğlu, Yunus Türk et al.
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
article

Comparison of Five Prognostic Scores for Association with Mortality in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Merve Ayık Türk, Gülru Polat, Berna Kömürcüoğlu, Yunus Türk, Özer Özdemir
article en

Abstract

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy, and treatment is based on survival prediction. The aim of our study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL, and NLR scores for survival in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients diagnosed with MPE were included in the study and examined retrospectively. All scores were calculated at the time of the diagnosis of MPE. Lung cancer patients who have MPE were admitted to the study, and the 30-day, six-month, and one-year mortality rates were taken as the endpoints. A total of 180 patients were examined; 138 (77%) were male, and the mean age was 65 ± 11 years. At 30 days of mortality, the values of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76–0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63–0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17–0.38). At six months and one year, the order of these AUCs was similar. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA3801/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>The AUCs for the AL and pNLR were not statistically significant at any time. The Cox regression analyses showed that at six months, the LENT score is a better predictor than PROMISE (p = 0.001) and RECLS (p = 0.02). At one year, the LENT score is a better predictor than PROMISE (p = 0.001), and there is no difference between the LENT and RECLS scores (p=0.64). The present study is the first that compares these five scores. We observed that LENT and RECLS scores are prognostic for long-term mortality in lung cancer patients with MPE.

Izmir University (TR), Izmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.