Advanced donor age does not impact graft survival in a large single centre lung transplant cohort

The scarcity of donor lungs for lung transplant (LTx) drives wait-list mortality for patients with end-stage lung disease. Thus, LTx centres in Australia and Europe have increasingly accepted age-extended criteria donor lungs for LTx- a practice not common in the USA. Nevertheless, long term data on older lung graft outcomes is limited. This retrospective analysis included 1114 LTx performed at The Alfred between 2010-2024 and compared graft survival (ie time to death or re-LTx) outcomes between donors aged < or ≥65yrs. All potential donors ≥65 yrs had mandatory chest CT assessment. Mean age of LTx recipients was 52±16yrs, 56.5% were male and the mean follow-up was 4.8±3.5yrs. Older donors were used in 146/1114 (13%) of all LTx. LTx recipients of older donors were themselves older 58 ± 11yrs vs 52 ± 16 yrs, p<0.001. However, there was no difference in graft survival for older donor lungs (median graft survival <65 yrs 8.3±0.5 vs ≥65yrs 8.5±0.5, p=0.255,or <70 yrs 8.5±0.6vs ≥70yrs 8.5±0.5,p=0.186). Additionally, there was no difference in the cause of death (malignancy vs infection vs CLAD vs other, p=0.438). Re-LTx occurred more often in the younger donor group (5.2%vs1.4%,p=0.043). Contrary to earlier US reports, graft survival is similar for lungs retrieved from donors <65, compared with donors ≥65(or even 70 yrs). Appropriately assessed age-extended lungs should be routinely considered for LTx. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA988/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.oa988
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced donor age does not impact graft survival in a large single centre lung transplant cohort

Helen Shingles, Andrei Darie, Glen Westall, Bronwyn Levvey et al.
Transplantation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Advanced donor age does not impact graft survival in a large single centre lung transplant cohort

Helen Shingles, Andrei Darie, Glen Westall, Bronwyn Levvey, Kovi Levin, Miranda Paraskeva, Gregory Snell
article en

Abstract

The scarcity of donor lungs for lung transplant (LTx) drives wait-list mortality for patients with end-stage lung disease. Thus, LTx centres in Australia and Europe have increasingly accepted age-extended criteria donor lungs for LTx- a practice not common in the USA. Nevertheless, long term data on older lung graft outcomes is limited. This retrospective analysis included 1114 LTx performed at The Alfred between 2010-2024 and compared graft survival (ie time to death or re-LTx) outcomes between donors aged < or ≥65yrs. All potential donors ≥65 yrs had mandatory chest CT assessment. Mean age of LTx recipients was 52±16yrs, 56.5% were male and the mean follow-up was 4.8±3.5yrs. Older donors were used in 146/1114 (13%) of all LTx. LTx recipients of older donors were themselves older 58 ± 11yrs vs 52 ± 16 yrs, p<0.001. However, there was no difference in graft survival for older donor lungs (median graft survival <65 yrs 8.3±0.5 vs ≥65yrs 8.5±0.5, p=0.255,or <70 yrs 8.5±0.6vs ≥70yrs 8.5±0.5,p=0.186). Additionally, there was no difference in the cause of death (malignancy vs infection vs CLAD vs other, p=0.438). Re-LTx occurred more often in the younger donor group (5.2%vs1.4%,p=0.043). Contrary to earlier US reports, graft survival is similar for lungs retrieved from donors <65, compared with donors ≥65(or even 70 yrs). Appropriately assessed age-extended lungs should be routinely considered for LTx. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA988/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Transplantation
The Alfred Hospital (AU), Alfred Health (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.