Putting faults in the northern Chilean subduction margin into motion: evidence for remote dynamic earthquake triggering on the plate interface and within the forearc

Dynamic stresses on the order of ~1 kPa from passing waves of mainshock earthquakes can trigger aftershocks at remote distances. Here, we investigate the prevalence of remote earthquake triggering in northern Chile, where aseismic-slip triggering has been documented. Our twofold approach to quantify triggerability includes a statistical difference-of-means test to quantify seismicity-rate changes bracketing candidate mainshock times, and a waveform-based approach to look for triggered earthquakes missing from the local catalog. We find no persistent, statistically-significant seismicity-rate increases associated with any of the candidate mainshocks when considering the local catalog in aggregate. However, catalog statistics reveal evidence for localized triggering both on the subduction interface and within the shallower forearc faults. Waveforms reveal local, uncataloged earthquakes only visible using a high-pass filter that removes the mainshock signal that otherwise overprints the local signals. Based on Japan mainshocks, we cannot rule out antipodal triggering. Areas showing higher triggerability are consistent with regions of low locking inferred from GNSS models and regions of observed aseismic slip. The spatial coincidence of triggering and low-locking, combined with the absence of a stress-triggering threshold, requires non-linear triggering mechanisms, such as altered frictional strength or aseismic-slip triggering, to be consistent with the observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seismica
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v3i2.1384
Citations
2
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting faults in the northern Chilean subduction margin into motion: evidence for remote dynamic earthquake triggering on the plate interface and within the forearc

R. M. Harrington, Marco Pascal Roth, Alessandro Verdecchia, D. Kilb et al.
2 citations
Seismica
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.07
article

Putting faults in the northern Chilean subduction margin into motion: evidence for remote dynamic earthquake triggering on the plate interface and within the forearc

R. M. Harrington, Marco Pascal Roth, Alessandro Verdecchia, D. Kilb, Pia Victor
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Dynamic stresses on the order of ~1 kPa from passing waves of mainshock earthquakes can trigger aftershocks at remote distances. Here, we investigate the prevalence of remote earthquake triggering in northern Chile, where aseismic-slip triggering has been documented. Our twofold approach to quantify triggerability includes a statistical difference-of-means test to quantify seismicity-rate changes bracketing candidate mainshock times, and a waveform-based approach to look for triggered earthquakes missing from the local catalog. We find no persistent, statistically-significant seismicity-rate increases associated with any of the candidate mainshocks when considering the local catalog in aggregate. However, catalog statistics reveal evidence for localized triggering both on the subduction interface and within the shallower forearc faults. Waveforms reveal local, uncataloged earthquakes only visible using a high-pass filter that removes the mainshock signal that otherwise overprints the local signals. Based on Japan mainshocks, we cannot rule out antipodal triggering. Areas showing higher triggerability are consistent with regions of low locking inferred from GNSS models and regions of observed aseismic slip. The spatial coincidence of triggering and low-locking, combined with the absence of a stress-triggering threshold, requires non-linear triggering mechanisms, such as altered frictional strength or aseismic-slip triggering, to be consistent with the observations.

SeismicaVol. 3(2)
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.