Developing international guidance to make impact assessment follow-up happen – reflections on an interactive design process

To advance impact assessment (IA) practice worldwide the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) has long promoted and published a series of international best practice principles, including the recently revised best practice principles for IA follow-up. IA follow-up refers to any kind of undertaking that seeks to ‘understand the outcomes of projects or plans’ that have been subject to IA. To support the implementation of these principles worldwide, a global guidance document has been developed (published by IAIA in 2024). The aims of this paper are to report on the approach undertaken to this guidance, applying a Delphi method, and to reflect on the utility and learnings derived from the process. To this end, the method of reflexivity was utilised as well as consideration of the broader literature. Overall, applying the Delphi approach in combination with international workshops helped calibrate international guidance that will be meaningful to a broad audience and relevant for unlocking worldwide experience. A key learning was that establishing and communicating international guidance generates tension between detailed explanations relevant to specific contexts versus generalization and overview.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2024.2421031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing international guidance to make impact assessment follow-up happen – reflections on an interactive design process

Jan-Albert Wessels, Angus Morrison‐Saunders, Alberto Fonseca, Patricia Fitzpatrick et al.
1 citations
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
0.71
article

Developing international guidance to make impact assessment follow-up happen – reflections on an interactive design process

Jan-Albert Wessels, Angus Morrison‐Saunders, Alberto Fonseca, Patricia Fitzpatrick, Annette Nykiel, Jos Arts, Urmila Jha‐Thakur, Richard Morgan, Luis Enrique Sánchez, Ciaran O’Faircheallaigh, Gesa Geißler, Bruce R. Muir, Charlotta Faith-Ell, Ainhoa González, William H. Ross, John Glasson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To advance impact assessment (IA) practice worldwide the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) has long promoted and published a series of international best practice principles, including the recently revised best practice principles for IA follow-up. IA follow-up refers to any kind of undertaking that seeks to ‘understand the outcomes of projects or plans’ that have been subject to IA. To support the implementation of these principles worldwide, a global guidance document has been developed (published by IAIA in 2024). The aims of this paper are to report on the approach undertaken to this guidance, applying a Delphi method, and to reflect on the utility and learnings derived from the process. To this end, the method of reflexivity was utilised as well as consideration of the broader literature. Overall, applying the Delphi approach in combination with international workshops helped calibrate international guidance that will be meaningful to a broad audience and relevant for unlocking worldwide experience. A key learning was that establishing and communicating international guidance generates tension between detailed explanations relevant to specific contexts versus generalization and overview.

Impact Assessment and Project AppraisalVol. 42(5)
University College Dublin (IE), Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR), Griffith University (AU), Edith Cowan University (AU), Oxford Brookes University (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), University of South Africa (ZA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Groningen (NL), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), North-West University (ZA), Assembly of First Nations (CA), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Mid Sweden University (SE), University of Otago (NZ), The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.