Predicting Disease Severity using Novel Digital Mobility Outcomes: A Deep Learning Approach in COPD Patients

<bold>Background:</bold> Deep learning models have the capacity to identify intricate patterns, dependencies, and interactions that may not be adequately captured by single statistics. <bold>Aim:</bold> To develop deep learning models to assess the capacity of Digital Mobility Outcomes (DMOs) in detecting COPD disease severity. <bold>Methods:</bold> This is a cross-sectional study evaluating the ability of each DMO (cadence, stride duration, stride length, walking speed, single support duration) to predict COPD severity according to the GOLD stages. A total of 31,456 walking bouts collected over 7-days from 17 patients were used. Multi-layer perceptron neural network models with a 10-fold cross-validation, 3 layers with 100 neurons each, were developed to evaluate the performance of DMOs to predict disease severity. DMOs served as features, with individual models built for each DMO. Statistical descriptors (mean, median, min, max, SD, coefficient of variation, percentiles (25th, 75th, 90th, 95th), age, and height) were used as inputs for walking bouts longer than 10 and 30 sec, aggregated on a weekly level. Performance metrics included Cohen's Kappa, F1 Score, Recall, Precision, and Accuracy to evaluate the models. <bold>Results:</bold> Models exhibited high levels of performance (Table). <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA2765/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>DMO</td><td>Kappa</td><td>F1</td><td>Recall</td><td>Precision</td><td>Accuracy</td></tr><tr><td>Cadence</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.90</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>Stride Duration</td><td>0.81</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.89</td></tr><tr><td>Stride Length</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.94</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>WalkingSpeed</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>SingleSupportDuration</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The advanced capability of deep learning models to handle complex relationships among features (statistical descriptors for each DMO), contributed to high success in predicting disease severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.oa2765
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Disease Severity using Novel Digital Mobility Outcomes: A Deep Learning Approach in COPD Patients

Emily Hume, Dimitrios Megaritis, Joren Buekers, Christopher Buckley et al.
1 links
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Predicting Disease Severity using Novel Digital Mobility Outcomes: A Deep Learning Approach in COPD Patients

Emily Hume, Dimitrios Megaritis, Joren Buekers, Christopher Buckley, Judith García‐Aymerich, Claudia Mazzà, Laura Delgado‐Ortiz, Walter Maetzler, Silvia Del Din, Philip M. Brown, Ioannis Vogiatzis, Lynn Rochester, Lisa Alcock, Tecla Bonci, Carlos Echevarria, Encarna Mico Amigo
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Deep learning models have the capacity to identify intricate patterns, dependencies, and interactions that may not be adequately captured by single statistics. <bold>Aim:</bold> To develop deep learning models to assess the capacity of Digital Mobility Outcomes (DMOs) in detecting COPD disease severity. <bold>Methods:</bold> This is a cross-sectional study evaluating the ability of each DMO (cadence, stride duration, stride length, walking speed, single support duration) to predict COPD severity according to the GOLD stages. A total of 31,456 walking bouts collected over 7-days from 17 patients were used. Multi-layer perceptron neural network models with a 10-fold cross-validation, 3 layers with 100 neurons each, were developed to evaluate the performance of DMOs to predict disease severity. DMOs served as features, with individual models built for each DMO. Statistical descriptors (mean, median, min, max, SD, coefficient of variation, percentiles (25th, 75th, 90th, 95th), age, and height) were used as inputs for walking bouts longer than 10 and 30 sec, aggregated on a weekly level. Performance metrics included Cohen's Kappa, F1 Score, Recall, Precision, and Accuracy to evaluate the models. <bold>Results:</bold> Models exhibited high levels of performance (Table). <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA2765/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>DMO</td><td>Kappa</td><td>F1</td><td>Recall</td><td>Precision</td><td>Accuracy</td></tr><tr><td>Cadence</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.90</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>Stride Duration</td><td>0.81</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.89</td></tr><tr><td>Stride Length</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.94</td><td>0.95</td><td>0.97</td><td>0.95</td></tr><tr><td>WalkingSpeed</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.91</td><td>0.87</td><td>0.89</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>SingleSupportDuration</td><td>0.72</td><td>0.82</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.77</td><td>0.83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The advanced capability of deep learning models to handle complex relationships among features (statistical descriptors for each DMO), contributed to high success in predicting disease severity.

Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Northumbria University (GB), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Newcastle University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.