Validation of electronic nose technology as diagnostic tool for different fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) requires chest CT-scan, (non)invasive investigations, and multidisciplinary teams (MDT). Diagnosis and treatment delays are common. Previous single-center studies showed that profiling of exhaled volatile organic compounds using electronic nose (eNose) sensor technology has potential to identify ILD quickly and noninvasively. We aim to validate eNose technology for diagnosing different fibrotic ILDs in an international multicenter cohort. <bold>Methods:</bold> Patients with 6 fibrotic ILD MDT diagnoses that often cause diagnostic dilemmas, were included in a prospective longitudinal study in 3 European ILD expert centers. The SpiroNose was used for exhaled breath analysis. Baseline breath data, split in training and test sets, were analysed with partial least squares discriminant and ROC analyses. <bold>Results:</bold> 372 patients (36.3% female) were included of whom 40.3% (n=150) had IPF. Differentiating breath profiles of patients with IPF and other fibrotic ILDs resulted in AUC of 0.94 (95%CI 0.91-0.97) in the training and 0.92 (0.87-0.98) in the test set. Moreover, individual ILDs could be discriminated with AUCs ranging 0.89-0.95 (Figure 1). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> This international study shows that eNose technology can differentiate breath profiles from patients with various fibrotic ILDs. eNose could help reducing diagnostic delay in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA2862/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.oa2862
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of electronic nose technology as diagnostic tool for different fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

Markus Polke, Michael Kreuter, Vincent Cottin, Iris G. van der Sar et al.
1 citations
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.18
article

Validation of electronic nose technology as diagnostic tool for different fibrotic interstitial lung diseases

Markus Polke, Michael Kreuter, Vincent Cottin, Iris G. van der Sar, Marlies Wijsenbeek, Leda Yazbeck, Philip L. Molyneaux, Catharina C. Moor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) requires chest CT-scan, (non)invasive investigations, and multidisciplinary teams (MDT). Diagnosis and treatment delays are common. Previous single-center studies showed that profiling of exhaled volatile organic compounds using electronic nose (eNose) sensor technology has potential to identify ILD quickly and noninvasively. We aim to validate eNose technology for diagnosing different fibrotic ILDs in an international multicenter cohort. <bold>Methods:</bold> Patients with 6 fibrotic ILD MDT diagnoses that often cause diagnostic dilemmas, were included in a prospective longitudinal study in 3 European ILD expert centers. The SpiroNose was used for exhaled breath analysis. Baseline breath data, split in training and test sets, were analysed with partial least squares discriminant and ROC analyses. <bold>Results:</bold> 372 patients (36.3% female) were included of whom 40.3% (n=150) had IPF. Differentiating breath profiles of patients with IPF and other fibrotic ILDs resulted in AUC of 0.94 (95%CI 0.91-0.97) in the training and 0.92 (0.87-0.98) in the test set. Moreover, individual ILDs could be discriminated with AUCs ranging 0.89-0.95 (Figure 1). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> This international study shows that eNose technology can differentiate breath profiles from patients with various fibrotic ILDs. eNose could help reducing diagnostic delay in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/OA2862/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig>

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Heidelberg University (DE), Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Erasmus MC (NL), Harefield Hospital (GB), Augenklinik Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Hautklinik Heidelberg (DE), Frauenklinik Heidelberg (DE), Hôpital Louis Pradel (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.