Association of impulse oscillometry and spirometry with COPD exacerbations

<bold>Background:</bold> Impulse oscillometry (IOS) may add information to spirometry for assessing COPD. This study aims to evaluate the association of COPD exacerbations with the parameters obtained with IOS. <bold>Methods:</bold> The study included 73 COPD patients diagnosed according to GOLD criteria (age 67.8 ± 14.4 years, 27 [37%] females, GOLD A: 9 [12.3%], B: 35 [47.9%] and E: 29 [39.7%]). <bold>Results:</bold> FEV1 and IOS parameters showed good associations with the history of exacerbations (Table 1). Table 1: <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA389/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td>FEV1%*</td><td>R5%*</td><td>X5%*</td><td>R5-20%*</td></tr><tr><td><bold>All exacerbations</bold></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0 (38, 52%)</td><td>58 (39-72)</td><td>148 (116-200)</td><td>407 (227-708)</td><td>342 (142-661)</td></tr><tr><td>1 (20, 27.4%)</td><td>50 (37-64)</td><td>171 (131-214)</td><td>550 (401-1241)</td><td>404 (173-610)</td></tr><tr><td>2 (15, 20.5%)</td><td>34 (21-43)</td><td>195 (148-269)</td><td>853 (431-2665)</td><td>787 (362-1024)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><italic>p = 0.001</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.080</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.017</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.033</italic></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Severe exacerbation</bold></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>no (47, 64.4%)</td><td>53 (39-65)</td><td>151 (116-200)</td><td>423 (242-738)</td><td>362 (144-697)</td></tr><tr><td>yes (26, 35.6%)</td><td>37 (29-62)</td><td>171 (140-245)</td><td>810 (425-1702)</td><td>517 (302-797)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><italic>p = 0.038</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.093</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.003</italic></td><td><italic>NS</italic></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> *median (IQR 25-75) In the ROC curve analysis (Figure 1), X5 had the largest AUC for a history of at least one severe exacerbation (AUC [95% CI]: FEV1% 0.646 [0.506 – 0.786], R5% 0.626 [0.490 – 0.761], X5% 0.712 [0.583 – 0.840], R5-20% 0.602 [0.467 – 0.736]). Figure 1: <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA389/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> IOS measurements show similar associations to spirometry with a history of COPD exacerbations, although there may be a better association of IOS (especially X5) with severe exacerbations of COPD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa389
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of impulse oscillometry and spirometry with COPD exacerbations

Maja Badovinac, Matevž Harlander, Dren Gruden, Erik Lipej et al.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Association of impulse oscillometry and spirometry with COPD exacerbations

Maja Badovinac, Matevž Harlander, Dren Gruden, Erik Lipej, Lana Novič
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Impulse oscillometry (IOS) may add information to spirometry for assessing COPD. This study aims to evaluate the association of COPD exacerbations with the parameters obtained with IOS. <bold>Methods:</bold> The study included 73 COPD patients diagnosed according to GOLD criteria (age 67.8 ± 14.4 years, 27 [37%] females, GOLD A: 9 [12.3%], B: 35 [47.9%] and E: 29 [39.7%]). <bold>Results:</bold> FEV1 and IOS parameters showed good associations with the history of exacerbations (Table 1). Table 1: <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA389/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td>FEV1%*</td><td>R5%*</td><td>X5%*</td><td>R5-20%*</td></tr><tr><td><bold>All exacerbations</bold></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>0 (38, 52%)</td><td>58 (39-72)</td><td>148 (116-200)</td><td>407 (227-708)</td><td>342 (142-661)</td></tr><tr><td>1 (20, 27.4%)</td><td>50 (37-64)</td><td>171 (131-214)</td><td>550 (401-1241)</td><td>404 (173-610)</td></tr><tr><td>2 (15, 20.5%)</td><td>34 (21-43)</td><td>195 (148-269)</td><td>853 (431-2665)</td><td>787 (362-1024)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><italic>p = 0.001</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.080</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.017</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.033</italic></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Severe exacerbation</bold></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>no (47, 64.4%)</td><td>53 (39-65)</td><td>151 (116-200)</td><td>423 (242-738)</td><td>362 (144-697)</td></tr><tr><td>yes (26, 35.6%)</td><td>37 (29-62)</td><td>171 (140-245)</td><td>810 (425-1702)</td><td>517 (302-797)</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><italic>p = 0.038</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.093</italic></td><td><italic>p = 0.003</italic></td><td><italic>NS</italic></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> *median (IQR 25-75) In the ROC curve analysis (Figure 1), X5 had the largest AUC for a history of at least one severe exacerbation (AUC [95% CI]: FEV1% 0.646 [0.506 – 0.786], R5% 0.626 [0.490 – 0.761], X5% 0.712 [0.583 – 0.840], R5-20% 0.602 [0.467 – 0.736]). Figure 1: <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA389/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> IOS measurements show similar associations to spirometry with a history of COPD exacerbations, although there may be a better association of IOS (especially X5) with severe exacerbations of COPD.

University of Ljubljana (SI), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.