Biologics for severe asthma: control and quality of life in real-life settings

<bold>Background:</bold> biologics are a key component of severe asthma treatment. Randomized controlled trials established clinical efficacy but evidences in real-life settings are scarce. <bold>Aim:</bold> to assess the efficacy of biologics on asthma control and quality of life (QoL) in severe/uncontrolled asthma (SUA) patients in real-life settings. <bold>Methods:</bold> RISER is an observational study in an epidemiological sample and in clinical cases with SUA (uncontrolled asthma with GINA step 4 or controlled asthma with step 5) investigated through questionnaires and routine clinical/functional assessments in Pisa and Ancona. The first 74 patients attending the Pisa center were analyzed through spirometry and Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) and a questionnaire on descriptive characteristics, risk factors, therapy, asthma control, QoL. Analysis of variance, adjusted for sex, age and school level, was run to assess the relationship between use of biologics and asthma control or QoL scores. <bold>Results:</bold> users (n=52) vs non-users (n=22) of biologics had a higher ACT asthma control (20.9±5.2 vs 18.1±5.9, p 0.056), a better QoL by miniAQLQ (total score 5.6±1.1 vs 4.7±1.3, p 0.003; symptoms 5.6±1.4 vs 4.8±1.5, p 0.033; activity limitations 5.8±1.4 vs 4.9±1.3, p 0.041; emotional domain 5.8±1.2 vs 4.6±1.7, p 0.002), a higher FEV1 (86.3±22.6 vs 76.6±20.2, p 0.151) and a lower FENO level (32.4±33.4 vs 56.0±49.8, p 0.026). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> we confirm the beneficial effects of biologics on SUA patients in a real-life setting. Information on long-term efficacy will be obtained after the planned follow-ups. Funding provided by GSK (study id 213698). GSK provided a review of publication accuracy; authors are responsible for content and interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa443
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biologics for severe asthma: control and quality of life in real-life settings

Giovanni Viegi, Maria Beatrice Bilò, Francesco Pistelli, Sara Maio et al.
Epidemiology
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Biologics for severe asthma: control and quality of life in real-life settings

Giovanni Viegi, Maria Beatrice Bilò, Francesco Pistelli, Sara Maio, Sandra Baldacci, Barbara Vagaggini, E. Iacopini, Laura Carrozzi, Maria Chiara Braschi
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> biologics are a key component of severe asthma treatment. Randomized controlled trials established clinical efficacy but evidences in real-life settings are scarce. <bold>Aim:</bold> to assess the efficacy of biologics on asthma control and quality of life (QoL) in severe/uncontrolled asthma (SUA) patients in real-life settings. <bold>Methods:</bold> RISER is an observational study in an epidemiological sample and in clinical cases with SUA (uncontrolled asthma with GINA step 4 or controlled asthma with step 5) investigated through questionnaires and routine clinical/functional assessments in Pisa and Ancona. The first 74 patients attending the Pisa center were analyzed through spirometry and Fractional exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) and a questionnaire on descriptive characteristics, risk factors, therapy, asthma control, QoL. Analysis of variance, adjusted for sex, age and school level, was run to assess the relationship between use of biologics and asthma control or QoL scores. <bold>Results:</bold> users (n=52) vs non-users (n=22) of biologics had a higher ACT asthma control (20.9±5.2 vs 18.1±5.9, p 0.056), a better QoL by miniAQLQ (total score 5.6±1.1 vs 4.7±1.3, p 0.003; symptoms 5.6±1.4 vs 4.8±1.5, p 0.033; activity limitations 5.8±1.4 vs 4.9±1.3, p 0.041; emotional domain 5.8±1.2 vs 4.6±1.7, p 0.002), a higher FEV1 (86.3±22.6 vs 76.6±20.2, p 0.151) and a lower FENO level (32.4±33.4 vs 56.0±49.8, p 0.026). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> we confirm the beneficial effects of biologics on SUA patients in a real-life setting. Information on long-term efficacy will be obtained after the planned follow-ups. Funding provided by GSK (study id 213698). GSK provided a review of publication accuracy; authors are responsible for content and interpretation.

Epidemiology
University of Pisa (IT), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" (IT), Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.