Impact of new positive bronchodilator test criteria

<bold>Background:</bold> According to 2005 ERS/ATS interpretative strategies, a positive bronchodilator response (BDR+) was considered an improvement of at least 200ml and 12% in FEV1 or FVC over baseline, using this improvement in FEV1 for the diagnosis of asthma. However, as a result of the change in the criteria for its diagnosis according to the GEMA 5.3 guideline, BDR+ is considered an improvement of 10% of the relationship in terms. Of the reference value to the old criteria already mentioned. <bold>Aim:</bold> Compare spirometry with positive bronchodilator using the old and/or new criteria. <bold>Methods:</bold> Prospective study of 500 spirometries collected through a telemedicine program (June 2023-October 2023) with positive bronchodilator response by old or new criteria for FEV1. <bold>Results:</bold> Clinical and functional characteristics of patients summarized in Table 1. Of the 500 BDR+ spirometries collected, 380 (76%) were positive for both criteria, so 24% (120) were only positive for one or the other condition. 72 spirometries (14%) new positive according to old diagnostic criteria and 48 (10%) according to new diagnostic criteria (Table 2) <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA409/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Proportion of BDR+ spirometries with new 2021 ERS/ATS interpretative strategies is markedly reduced, to almost 5%. This could modify our functional diagnoses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa409
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of new positive bronchodilator test criteria

Eva Tabernero, Patricia Sobradillo, Iolanda García González, Edurne Echevarría et al.
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Impact of new positive bronchodilator test criteria

Eva Tabernero, Patricia Sobradillo, Iolanda García González, Edurne Echevarría, Laura Cortezon, Teresa Bretos, Larraitz García, Nuria Marina, Carlos Caldera, Jone Solorzano
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> According to 2005 ERS/ATS interpretative strategies, a positive bronchodilator response (BDR+) was considered an improvement of at least 200ml and 12% in FEV1 or FVC over baseline, using this improvement in FEV1 for the diagnosis of asthma. However, as a result of the change in the criteria for its diagnosis according to the GEMA 5.3 guideline, BDR+ is considered an improvement of 10% of the relationship in terms. Of the reference value to the old criteria already mentioned. <bold>Aim:</bold> Compare spirometry with positive bronchodilator using the old and/or new criteria. <bold>Methods:</bold> Prospective study of 500 spirometries collected through a telemedicine program (June 2023-October 2023) with positive bronchodilator response by old or new criteria for FEV1. <bold>Results:</bold> Clinical and functional characteristics of patients summarized in Table 1. Of the 500 BDR+ spirometries collected, 380 (76%) were positive for both criteria, so 24% (120) were only positive for one or the other condition. 72 spirometries (14%) new positive according to old diagnostic criteria and 48 (10%) according to new diagnostic criteria (Table 2) <fig><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA409/F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><object-id>F1</object-id><graphic></graphic></fig> <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Proportion of BDR+ spirometries with new 2021 ERS/ATS interpretative strategies is markedly reduced, to almost 5%. This could modify our functional diagnoses.

Hospital de Cruces (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.