Sustainable Education for Sustainable Heritage: Managing the Tension Between Professional Practice and Critical Inquiry

This paper reflects on Uppsala University’s experiences from organizing higher education in conservation, and argues how curricula can be rethought and reorganized to foster a genuine shift towards sustainable education. It discusses various experiences of developing and planning interdisciplinary higher education programs in conservation and how curricula can be transformed to broaden the sustainability competence of future heritage professionals. We need to foster heritage professionals that are capable of exploiting the dynamic and negotiated nature of heritage for the good of society. By embracing change and loss there are opportunities to use heritage in more benign and sustainable ways. But there are profound differences between how heritage and its role in society are understood in conservation as a field of practice and as a field of inquiry. Based on the experience from Uppsala University, the authors argue that there is a need for a conservation curriculum in higher education that balances and integrates normative competence and critical inquiry: a middle path, where opposing perspectives can thrive in parallel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2024.2415792
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Education for Sustainable Heritage: Managing the Tension Between Professional Practice and Critical Inquiry

Tor Broström, Gustaf Leijonhufvud, Anna Karlström
1 citations
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation
Sustainability in Higher Education
2.10
article

Sustainable Education for Sustainable Heritage: Managing the Tension Between Professional Practice and Critical Inquiry

Tor Broström, Gustaf Leijonhufvud, Anna Karlström
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper reflects on Uppsala University’s experiences from organizing higher education in conservation, and argues how curricula can be rethought and reorganized to foster a genuine shift towards sustainable education. It discusses various experiences of developing and planning interdisciplinary higher education programs in conservation and how curricula can be transformed to broaden the sustainability competence of future heritage professionals. We need to foster heritage professionals that are capable of exploiting the dynamic and negotiated nature of heritage for the good of society. By embracing change and loss there are opportunities to use heritage in more benign and sustainable ways. But there are profound differences between how heritage and its role in society are understood in conservation as a field of practice and as a field of inquiry. Based on the experience from Uppsala University, the authors argue that there is a need for a conservation curriculum in higher education that balances and integrates normative competence and critical inquiry: a middle path, where opposing perspectives can thrive in parallel.

Journal of the American Institute for ConservationVol. 64(1)
Uppsala University (SE)
Princeton University, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Uppsala Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sustainability in Higher Education
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.