Lost in translation: the lack of agreement between surgeons and scientists regarding biomaterials research and innovation for treating bone defects

To conclude, this study was conducted through a web-based survey, highlighting a substantial translational gap. It underscores the immediate need ("call to action") for meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration between surgeons and scientists, often referred to as the need to "walk the talk". The findings underscore the critical importance of aligning clinical needs, research outcomes, and regulatory frameworks to improve the development and implementation of biomaterial-based bone graft substitutes that demonstrate efficacy and efficiency in bone defect treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03734-z
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in translation: the lack of agreement between surgeons and scientists regarding biomaterials research and innovation for treating bone defects

Ho Fai Chan, Dietmar W. Hutmacher, Frank Hildebrand, Stephen Whyte et al.
15 citations
BMC Medicine
Anatomy and Medical Technology
2.77
article

Lost in translation: the lack of agreement between surgeons and scientists regarding biomaterials research and innovation for treating bone defects

Ho Fai Chan, Dietmar W. Hutmacher, Frank Hildebrand, Stephen Whyte, Susanne Mayer‐Wagner, Uwe Dulleck, Markus Laubach, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Ulrich Kneser, Tina Frankenbach-Désor
article en
15 citations

Abstract

To conclude, this study was conducted through a web-based survey, highlighting a substantial translational gap. It underscores the immediate need ("call to action") for meaningful interdisciplinary collaboration between surgeons and scientists, often referred to as the need to "walk the talk". The findings underscore the critical importance of aligning clinical needs, research outcomes, and regulatory frameworks to improve the development and implementation of biomaterial-based bone graft substitutes that demonstrate efficacy and efficiency in bone defect treatment.

BMC MedicineVol. 22(1)
Australian Research Council (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Heidelberg University (DE), Ludwigshafen University of Business and Society (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
2.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lost in translation: the lack of agreement between surgeons and scientists regarding biomaterials research and innovation for treating bone defects — Ho Fai Chan, Dietmar W. Hutmacher, et al. · BMC Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS