Spirometry telemonitoring in lung transplant patients

<bold>Introduction:</bold> The most common complication after Lung transplantation (LTx) is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which affects long-term outcomes. CLAD may be partially reversible, especially after early detection of the cause. For this reason, systematic monitoring of transplanted lung function, including spirometry values and a telemedical approach, is recommended. We evaluated the feasibility and clinical usefulness of spirometry telemonitoring in LTx patients. <bold>Methods:</bold> We retrospectively compared three groups of LTx recipients from the Silesian Heart Disease Center (Zabrze, Poland). The first was subjected to home spirometry telemonitoring (N=21), the second group was monitored with home spirometry (N=23), and the control group underwent routine follow-ups only in the transplant centre (N=32). Spirometry values, adherence, correctness and number of visits were evaluated. <bold>Results:</bold> Twenty-one lung transplant patients (9 women, 53.0 y.o, BMI 21.4) were studied over an average of 252.2 days, showing 62.7% adherence to daily spirometry, with 225 tests per patient. Spirometry accuracy was 59.7% for FEV1 and 58.9% for FVC. Adherence was stable for six months, then dropped, with correctness improving over time. FEV1/FVC ratios decreased over time, while FVC improved significantly. Emergency visits were fewer in telemonitoring (1.24) vs routine care (2.34, p=0.049). Visit duration was shorter in telemonitoring (5.8 days, p=0.0033) compared to routine care (10 days) and standard spirometry (8.7 days, p=0.034). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Spirometry telemonitoring for lung transplant patients is effective, ensuring high test accuracy and compliance. It leads to fewer, shorter hospital visits versus standard monitoring or routine follow-ups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa587
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spirometry telemonitoring in lung transplant patients

Weronika Kowalczyk, Mateusz Soliński, Marek Ochman, Wojciech Bojanowicz et al.
Transplantation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Spirometry telemonitoring in lung transplant patients

Weronika Kowalczyk, Mateusz Soliński, Marek Ochman, Wojciech Bojanowicz, Dagmara Galle, Fryderyk Zawadzki, Łukasz Kołtowski, Mikołaj Basza, Tomasz Hrapkowicz
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> The most common complication after Lung transplantation (LTx) is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), which affects long-term outcomes. CLAD may be partially reversible, especially after early detection of the cause. For this reason, systematic monitoring of transplanted lung function, including spirometry values and a telemedical approach, is recommended. We evaluated the feasibility and clinical usefulness of spirometry telemonitoring in LTx patients. <bold>Methods:</bold> We retrospectively compared three groups of LTx recipients from the Silesian Heart Disease Center (Zabrze, Poland). The first was subjected to home spirometry telemonitoring (N=21), the second group was monitored with home spirometry (N=23), and the control group underwent routine follow-ups only in the transplant centre (N=32). Spirometry values, adherence, correctness and number of visits were evaluated. <bold>Results:</bold> Twenty-one lung transplant patients (9 women, 53.0 y.o, BMI 21.4) were studied over an average of 252.2 days, showing 62.7% adherence to daily spirometry, with 225 tests per patient. Spirometry accuracy was 59.7% for FEV1 and 58.9% for FVC. Adherence was stable for six months, then dropped, with correctness improving over time. FEV1/FVC ratios decreased over time, while FVC improved significantly. Emergency visits were fewer in telemonitoring (1.24) vs routine care (2.34, p=0.049). Visit duration was shorter in telemonitoring (5.8 days, p=0.0033) compared to routine care (10 days) and standard spirometry (8.7 days, p=0.034). <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Spirometry telemonitoring for lung transplant patients is effective, ensuring high test accuracy and compliance. It leads to fewer, shorter hospital visits versus standard monitoring or routine follow-ups.

Transplantation
Medical University of Silesia (PL), King's College London (GB), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Silesian Center for Heart Disease (PL), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.