How the COVID-19 pandemic shaped Canadians’ preferences for setting of dying: Comparison of two panel surveys

The purpose of this article is to assess whether COVID-19 shaped Canadians' preferred settings of dying. We compared data collected using the same survey from two independent but comparable sets of panel respondents, prior to and after the onset of the pandemic. A vignette methodology was used to assess preferences for dying in each of four settings: home, acute/intensive care, palliative care, and long-term residential care. Although preferences for dying at home, in acute/intensive care and palliative care units did not change, preferences for dying in nursing homes significantly declined. In the pandemic's first and second waves, the spread of knowledge about problems of poor care, visitation restrictions, and fears of contagion in Canadian long-term residential care may have shaped public perceptions of and preferences for dying these settings. If this change persists, it may influence advance care planning decisions. That preferences for dying at home did not shift is noteworthy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241297037
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the COVID-19 pandemic shaped Canadians’ preferences for setting of dying: Comparison of two panel surveys

Andrea Rounce, Maria Cherba, Marian Krawczyk, Corey Scott Mackenzie et al.
Healthcare Management Forum
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

How the COVID-19 pandemic shaped Canadians’ preferences for setting of dying: Comparison of two panel surveys

Andrea Rounce, Maria Cherba, Marian Krawczyk, Corey Scott Mackenzie, Laura Funk, S. Robin Cohen, KELLI I. STAJDUHAR, Li-elle Rapaport
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to assess whether COVID-19 shaped Canadians' preferred settings of dying. We compared data collected using the same survey from two independent but comparable sets of panel respondents, prior to and after the onset of the pandemic. A vignette methodology was used to assess preferences for dying in each of four settings: home, acute/intensive care, palliative care, and long-term residential care. Although preferences for dying at home, in acute/intensive care and palliative care units did not change, preferences for dying in nursing homes significantly declined. In the pandemic's first and second waves, the spread of knowledge about problems of poor care, visitation restrictions, and fears of contagion in Canadian long-term residential care may have shaped public perceptions of and preferences for dying these settings. If this change persists, it may influence advance care planning decisions. That preferences for dying at home did not shift is noteworthy.

Healthcare Management ForumVol. 38(2)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Victoria (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), University of Manitoba (CA), McGill University (CA), University of Glasgow (GB)
McGill University, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.