Analysis, Testing and Comparison of Different Commercial ESD Detectors

This paper investigates the response of various commercial electrostatic discharge (ESD) detectors with respect to their ability to detect charged device model (CDM) like short pulses and their ability to discriminate between CDM and non-CDM pulses. A series of test setups (TEM cell, sphere-to-Gnd discharge, narrow pulse generator) were set up to evaluate how different detectors behave at different pulse widths and field strengths. Pulse durations varying from 150 ps - 16 ns FWHM were applied in the different test setups. The measured responses of the detectors under different ESD conditions are analyzed and compared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/emccompo61192.2024.10742033
Primary Topic
Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis, Testing and Comparison of Different Commercial ESD Detectors

David Pommerenke, Ahmad Hosseinbeig, Gabriel Fellner, Abraham Reithofer et al.
Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics
article

Analysis, Testing and Comparison of Different Commercial ESD Detectors

David Pommerenke, Ahmad Hosseinbeig, Gabriel Fellner, Abraham Reithofer, Musab Hameed
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the response of various commercial electrostatic discharge (ESD) detectors with respect to their ability to detect charged device model (CDM) like short pulses and their ability to discriminate between CDM and non-CDM pulses. A series of test setups (TEM cell, sphere-to-Gnd discharge, narrow pulse generator) were set up to evaluate how different detectors behave at different pulse widths and field strengths. Pulse durations varying from 150 ps - 16 ns FWHM were applied in the different test setups. The measured responses of the detectors under different ESD conditions are analyzed and compared.

Graz University of Technology (AT), Apple (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.