Patients’ perspectives and perceptions of asthma clinical remission: A global view

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Clinical remission (CR) is an emerging, ambitious treatment goal for asthma patients. Prior survey results suggest the 4-point CR definition is appealing and achievable. As CR evolves with additional criteria, patient perspectives are necessary to understand the value and attainability. <bold>Aims and Objectives:</bold> Explore asthma patient perspectives on the additional criteria and management of CR. <bold>Methods:</bold> An international online community of 125 participants with moderate to severe asthma across 6 countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan, USA) were surveyed on CR definitions and management practices using a qualitative-focused survey. CR was defined as OCS freedom, stable/ optimised lung function, symptom control, and no asthma exacerbations over 12 months. Additional criteria included work/school days missed, reduced rescue and maintenance inhaler use, and physician concordance. Response proportions were reported. <bold>Results:</bold> 80% of patients found the additional criteria to be appealing, with 72% rating them as achievable. Parameters beyond symptoms, such as work or school days missed, and reduction of inhaler dose were noted as desirable criteria. Regarding CR management, 67% reported discussing CR and additional criteria at some or most physician appointments; 78% of patients work in partnership with their doctor on their treatment plan, of which 31% report increased patient ownership. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Patients consider the additional criteria to be appealing and attainable. Elements such as missed work and school days were valued as markers of increased quality of life; 4-point CR and additional criteria are becoming more integrated into patient-physician discussions. <bold>Funding:</bold> GSK (214851)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1183
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ perspectives and perceptions of asthma clinical remission: A global view

Kellie Chase, Samantha Valliant, Alison Moore, Stephen G. Noorduyn et al.
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Patients’ perspectives and perceptions of asthma clinical remission: A global view

Kellie Chase, Samantha Valliant, Alison Moore, Stephen G. Noorduyn, J. Barazetti-Scott, A. Picton-March, Steven A. Gould, Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Clinical remission (CR) is an emerging, ambitious treatment goal for asthma patients. Prior survey results suggest the 4-point CR definition is appealing and achievable. As CR evolves with additional criteria, patient perspectives are necessary to understand the value and attainability. <bold>Aims and Objectives:</bold> Explore asthma patient perspectives on the additional criteria and management of CR. <bold>Methods:</bold> An international online community of 125 participants with moderate to severe asthma across 6 countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan, USA) were surveyed on CR definitions and management practices using a qualitative-focused survey. CR was defined as OCS freedom, stable/ optimised lung function, symptom control, and no asthma exacerbations over 12 months. Additional criteria included work/school days missed, reduced rescue and maintenance inhaler use, and physician concordance. Response proportions were reported. <bold>Results:</bold> 80% of patients found the additional criteria to be appealing, with 72% rating them as achievable. Parameters beyond symptoms, such as work or school days missed, and reduction of inhaler dose were noted as desirable criteria. Regarding CR management, 67% reported discussing CR and additional criteria at some or most physician appointments; 78% of patients work in partnership with their doctor on their treatment plan, of which 31% report increased patient ownership. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Patients consider the additional criteria to be appealing and attainable. Elements such as missed work and school days were valued as markers of increased quality of life; 4-point CR and additional criteria are becoming more integrated into patient-physician discussions. <bold>Funding:</bold> GSK (214851)

Newman University (GB), Southern New Hampshire University (US), Health Outcomes Solutions (United States) (US), GlaxoSmithKline (Canada) (CA), GlaxoSmithKline (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.