Coupling system engineering and decision aid by encompassing potential of integration with the means of multi-criteria aggregation

Theoretical foundations for systems engineering include research opportunities to create bridges between systems engineering and applied mathematics. While System Engineering deals with interactions between systems prospective performance evaluation and decisions, decision aid tools and methods are rather absent from the toolsets offered to engineers to pass or fail to a next step in design. Decisions are sequenced by humans, following prescribed methodologies. Theoretical decision principles in applied mathematics show that global product of a set of local decisions taken independently from one another will be suboptimal in terms of quality, resource and time <Q,R,T>. This position paper presents the available toolsets in mathematical models to create decision aid in architectures from multi-objective perspectives, and suggestions on how to connect both disciplines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isse63315.2024.10741105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coupling system engineering and decision aid by encompassing potential of integration with the means of multi-criteria aggregation

Alexis Poindron, Lorraine Brisacier‐Porchon, Omar Hammami
1 citations
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
article

Coupling system engineering and decision aid by encompassing potential of integration with the means of multi-criteria aggregation

Alexis Poindron, Lorraine Brisacier‐Porchon, Omar Hammami
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Theoretical foundations for systems engineering include research opportunities to create bridges between systems engineering and applied mathematics. While System Engineering deals with interactions between systems prospective performance evaluation and decisions, decision aid tools and methods are rather absent from the toolsets offered to engineers to pass or fail to a next step in design. Decisions are sequenced by humans, following prescribed methodologies. Theoretical decision principles in applied mathematics show that global product of a set of local decisions taken independently from one another will be suboptimal in terms of quality, resource and time <Q,R,T>. This position paper presents the available toolsets in mathematical models to create decision aid in architectures from multi-objective perspectives, and suggestions on how to connect both disciplines.

École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.