Objectives for algorithmic decision-making systems in childhood asthma: perspectives of children, parents, and physicians.

<bold>Objectives:</bold> To identify with children, parents and physicians the objectives to be used as parameters for algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS) adapting treatments in childhood asthma. <bold>Methods:</bold> We first conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews to explore the objectives that children aged 8 to 17 years, their parents and their physicians seek to achieve when taking/giving/prescribing a treatment for asthma. Following the grounded theory approach, each interview was independently coded by 2 researchers; reconciled codes were used to assess code frequency, categories were defined, and the main objectives identified. We then conducted a quantitative study based on questionnaires using these objectives to determine how children/parents/physicians ranked these objectives and whether their responses were aligned. <bold>Results:</bold> We interviewed 71 participants (31 children, 30 parents and 10 physicians) in the qualitative study, and identified seven objectives associated with treatment uptake and five objectives associated with treatment modalities. We included 291 participants (137 children, 137 parents and 17 physicians) in the quantitative study. We found little correlation between child, parent, and physician scores for each of the objectives. Each child's asthma history influenced the choice of scores assigned to each objective by the child, parents and physician. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The identified objectives are relevant to athma's management. They can be incorporated as parameters for future ADMS. Shared decision making is essential to achieve consensus among children, parents and physicians when choosing the weight to assign to each of these objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa794
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectives for algorithmic decision-making systems in childhood asthma: perspectives of children, parents, and physicians.

Christophe Delacourt, Guillaume Lezmi, Alexandra Pirojoc, David Drummond et al.
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Objectives for algorithmic decision-making systems in childhood asthma: perspectives of children, parents, and physicians.

Christophe Delacourt, Guillaume Lezmi, Alexandra Pirojoc, David Drummond, Apolline Gonsard, Flore Amat, Nadia Nathan, Stéphanie Wanin, Blandine Prévost, Rola Abou Taam, Johan Personnic, Omar Masrour
article en

Abstract

<bold>Objectives:</bold> To identify with children, parents and physicians the objectives to be used as parameters for algorithmic decision-making systems (ADMS) adapting treatments in childhood asthma. <bold>Methods:</bold> We first conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews to explore the objectives that children aged 8 to 17 years, their parents and their physicians seek to achieve when taking/giving/prescribing a treatment for asthma. Following the grounded theory approach, each interview was independently coded by 2 researchers; reconciled codes were used to assess code frequency, categories were defined, and the main objectives identified. We then conducted a quantitative study based on questionnaires using these objectives to determine how children/parents/physicians ranked these objectives and whether their responses were aligned. <bold>Results:</bold> We interviewed 71 participants (31 children, 30 parents and 10 physicians) in the qualitative study, and identified seven objectives associated with treatment uptake and five objectives associated with treatment modalities. We included 291 participants (137 children, 137 parents and 17 physicians) in the quantitative study. We found little correlation between child, parent, and physician scores for each of the objectives. Each child's asthma history influenced the choice of scores assigned to each objective by the child, parents and physician. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> The identified objectives are relevant to athma's management. They can be incorporated as parameters for future ADMS. Shared decision making is essential to achieve consensus among children, parents and physicians when choosing the weight to assign to each of these objectives.

Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), CHU Ambroise Paré (BE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut Necker Enfants Malades (FR), Hôpital Armand-Trousseau (FR), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR), Hôpital Ambroise-Paré (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.