Tower Companies vs. Mergers in Mobile Networks

Tower companies own almost three quarters of the mobile telecom installations globally and continue to grow. The main driver of this change is linked to the reduction of capital expenditures by operators and the increasing sharing of infrastructure by tower companies that improves their assets' tenancy ratios. In this article we review the history of tower company introductions in European markets, and compare the operator financial outcomes, along with the cost of services and market concentration that consumers experience. We also compare the wave of mergers during the same period in Europe, as an alternative cost-saving approach. We find that mergers primarily help operators improve their financial positions and EBITDA margin by 8.6 percentage points while consumers face significantly more concentrated markets with fewer options. Tower companies reduce average revenues per user by 1.41–1.79 Euros as increased tenancy ratios are passed-through to consumers, helping operators reduce their capital expenditures. We provide policy and market recommendations based on these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Communications Magazine
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.001.2400108
Citations
2
Primary Topic
ICT Impact and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tower Companies vs. Mergers in Mobile Networks

Κωνσταντίνος Μασσέλος, Pantelis Koutroumpis
2 citations
IEEE Communications Magazine
ICT Impact and Policies
0.64
article

Tower Companies vs. Mergers in Mobile Networks

Κωνσταντίνος Μασσέλος, Pantelis Koutroumpis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Tower companies own almost three quarters of the mobile telecom installations globally and continue to grow. The main driver of this change is linked to the reduction of capital expenditures by operators and the increasing sharing of infrastructure by tower companies that improves their assets' tenancy ratios. In this article we review the history of tower company introductions in European markets, and compare the operator financial outcomes, along with the cost of services and market concentration that consumers experience. We also compare the wave of mergers during the same period in Europe, as an alternative cost-saving approach. We find that mergers primarily help operators improve their financial positions and EBITDA margin by 8.6 percentage points while consumers face significantly more concentrated markets with fewer options. Tower companies reduce average revenues per user by 1.41–1.79 Euros as increased tenancy ratios are passed-through to consumers, helping operators reduce their capital expenditures. We provide policy and market recommendations based on these findings.

IEEE Communications MagazineVol. 62(11)
University of Peloponnese (GR), Oxford Spires Academy (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
ICT Impact and Policies
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tower Companies vs. Mergers in Mobile Networks — Κωνσταντίνος Μασσέλος, Pantelis Koutroumpis · IEEE Communications Magazine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS