Efficacy of bottle positive expiratory pressure (Bottle-PEP) therapy as adjunct to bronchodilators in stable COPD patients

<bold>Background:</bold> The adjunctive role of Bottle-PEP therapy to inhaled bronchodilators in stable COPD is unknown. <bold>Aims and Objectives:</bold> Our study was a single-blind RCT designed to find out whether the use of bottle PEP therapy with huff-cough as an adjunct to bronchodilators in stable COPD patients resulted in additional decrease in Breathlessness Cough Sputum Scale (BCSS) and COPD Assessment Test score (CAT) as compared to control. <bold>Methods:</bold> Baseline scores were measured. Stable COPD patients (GOLD Groups: B, C, D) were randomised into two arms. Intervention arm: Performed twice-daily five sets of ten exhalations through a 10-cm water column of Bottle-PEP followed by huff-cough and a 2-minute interval between sets. This was followed by inhaled bronchodilator therapy. Control arm: huff-cough followed by inhaled bronchodilators. Study duration was three months. The assessor was blind to the allocation arms. <bold>Results:</bold> At the end of three-months, the intervention & control arm had 41 & 39 patients, respectively. The decrease in mean CAT score from baseline in the intervention arm was 6.05 +/- 4.04 points, compared to 4 +/- 3.87 in the control arm. The mean BCSS score decreased by 1.93 +/- 1.66 in the intervention arm compared to 1.13 +/- 1.44 in the control arm. The decrease in CAT scores was significantly more in the intervention arm (t test -2.314, 95% CI = -3.81 to -0.28, p=0.02). Similarly, BCSS was significantly more reduced in the intervention arm (t test -2.293, 95% CI = -1.49 to -0.10, p=0.025). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Significant intra group changes were observed in both arms, with the intervention arm showing a significantly greater decrease in CAT and BCSS scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1228
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of bottle positive expiratory pressure (Bottle-PEP) therapy as adjunct to bronchodilators in stable COPD patients

Subho Sarkar, Manoj Kumar Panigrahi, Shakti Kumar Bal
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Efficacy of bottle positive expiratory pressure (Bottle-PEP) therapy as adjunct to bronchodilators in stable COPD patients

Subho Sarkar, Manoj Kumar Panigrahi, Shakti Kumar Bal
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> The adjunctive role of Bottle-PEP therapy to inhaled bronchodilators in stable COPD is unknown. <bold>Aims and Objectives:</bold> Our study was a single-blind RCT designed to find out whether the use of bottle PEP therapy with huff-cough as an adjunct to bronchodilators in stable COPD patients resulted in additional decrease in Breathlessness Cough Sputum Scale (BCSS) and COPD Assessment Test score (CAT) as compared to control. <bold>Methods:</bold> Baseline scores were measured. Stable COPD patients (GOLD Groups: B, C, D) were randomised into two arms. Intervention arm: Performed twice-daily five sets of ten exhalations through a 10-cm water column of Bottle-PEP followed by huff-cough and a 2-minute interval between sets. This was followed by inhaled bronchodilator therapy. Control arm: huff-cough followed by inhaled bronchodilators. Study duration was three months. The assessor was blind to the allocation arms. <bold>Results:</bold> At the end of three-months, the intervention & control arm had 41 & 39 patients, respectively. The decrease in mean CAT score from baseline in the intervention arm was 6.05 +/- 4.04 points, compared to 4 +/- 3.87 in the control arm. The mean BCSS score decreased by 1.93 +/- 1.66 in the intervention arm compared to 1.13 +/- 1.44 in the control arm. The decrease in CAT scores was significantly more in the intervention arm (t test -2.314, 95% CI = -3.81 to -0.28, p=0.02). Similarly, BCSS was significantly more reduced in the intervention arm (t test -2.293, 95% CI = -1.49 to -0.10, p=0.025). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Significant intra group changes were observed in both arms, with the intervention arm showing a significantly greater decrease in CAT and BCSS scores.

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.