Health-related quality of life and asthma control in patients receiving or not receiving biologic treatments for severe asthma. Data from SHARP CRC

<bold>Background:</bold> Biologic treatments are increasingly used in severe asthma. <bold>Aim</bold>: To compare clinical characteristics in patients receiving biologic treatments for ≥1 month compared to those not prescribed a biologic <italic>or</italic> receiving a biologic for <1 month. <bold>Method</bold>: Real-word data from adults in the Severe Heterogeneous Asthma Research Collaboration Patient-centred (SHARP) registry included the Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ), SAQ-global, Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ) collected via PatientCoach app and clinical data. Patients established (receiving treatment ≥1 month) or not established (not prescribed or on treatment <1 month) on biologics were compared using t-tests. <bold>Results:</bold> Data were available for 221 participants. 103 not established and 118 established (mean 33 months) on biologics. Questionnaire scores were significantly better in patients established on biologics. Exacerbations and daily ICS use were also significantly lower in this group (Table 1). <bold>Conclusion</bold>: These data show that biologic treatments significantly improve asthma HRQoL and control, while reducing exacerbations and reliance on ICS. Table 1. Means (n) and <italic>SDs</italic> for questionnaires and clinical data for patients established or not on biologics. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2168/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td>Not established</td><td>Established</td></tr><tr><td> SAQ (1-7) </td><td> 4.12 (63) <italic>1.76</italic> </td><td> 5.38* (75) <italic>1.41</italic> </td></tr><tr><td> SAQ-global (0-100) </td><td> 49.32 (63) <italic>23.89</italic> </td><td> 69.76* (75) <italic>19.09</italic> </td></tr><tr><td> ACQ (6-0) </td><td> 2.50 (81) <italic>1.39</italic> </td><td> 1.41* (96) <italic>1.18</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>BMI</td><td> 30.75 (103) <italic>7.81</italic> </td><td> 32.53 (117) <italic>33.03</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>FEV1</td><td> 2.50 (89) <italic>0.76</italic> </td><td> 2.67 (108) <italic>0.95</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>FEV1%pred</td><td> 83.43 (89) <italic>20.38</italic> </td><td> 83.34 (110) <italic>21.53</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>Exacerbations</td><td> 2.59 (103) <italic>2.47</italic> </td><td> 1.67* (118) <italic>2.26</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>Hospital admissions</td><td> 0.35 (103) <italic>0.74</italic> </td><td> 0.26 (116) <italic>0.74</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>Daily ICS (BDP equivalent)</td><td> 878.05 (97) <italic>1015.59</italic> </td><td> 483.77* (110) <italic>773.29</italic> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> *p<0.01

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2168
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health-related quality of life and asthma control in patients receiving or not receiving biologic treatments for severe asthma. Data from SHARP CRC

Anneke Ten Brinke, Dawn Redwood, Sabina Škrgat, Jacob K. Sont et al.
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Health-related quality of life and asthma control in patients receiving or not receiving biologic treatments for severe asthma. Data from SHARP CRC

Anneke Ten Brinke, Dawn Redwood, Sabina Škrgat, Jacob K. Sont, Michael E. Hyland, Matthew Masoli, Pedro Nogueira, Simon Doe, Inês Farinha, Fleur L. Meulmeester, Kristina Biekšienė, Barbro Dahlén, Jo Tilley, Dominique Hamerlijnck, L. Havé, Valentyna Yasinska, Anne Mcgahey, Joseph Lanario, Jolita Palačionytė, Sanja Hromiš, Peter Kopač, Cláudia Chaves Loureiro, Mariana Paula-Rezelj, Ana Žaže Bertoncel, Oksana Tenzelius, Maria Gonçalves Cunh, Kathleen Bayani, Tania Wainwright
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Biologic treatments are increasingly used in severe asthma. <bold>Aim</bold>: To compare clinical characteristics in patients receiving biologic treatments for ≥1 month compared to those not prescribed a biologic <italic>or</italic> receiving a biologic for <1 month. <bold>Method</bold>: Real-word data from adults in the Severe Heterogeneous Asthma Research Collaboration Patient-centred (SHARP) registry included the Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ), SAQ-global, Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ) collected via PatientCoach app and clinical data. Patients established (receiving treatment ≥1 month) or not established (not prescribed or on treatment <1 month) on biologics were compared using t-tests. <bold>Results:</bold> Data were available for 221 participants. 103 not established and 118 established (mean 33 months) on biologics. Questionnaire scores were significantly better in patients established on biologics. Exacerbations and daily ICS use were also significantly lower in this group (Table 1). <bold>Conclusion</bold>: These data show that biologic treatments significantly improve asthma HRQoL and control, while reducing exacerbations and reliance on ICS. Table 1. Means (n) and <italic>SDs</italic> for questionnaires and clinical data for patients established or not on biologics. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2168/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td>Not established</td><td>Established</td></tr><tr><td> SAQ (1-7) </td><td> 4.12 (63) <italic>1.76</italic> </td><td> 5.38* (75) <italic>1.41</italic> </td></tr><tr><td> SAQ-global (0-100) </td><td> 49.32 (63) <italic>23.89</italic> </td><td> 69.76* (75) <italic>19.09</italic> </td></tr><tr><td> ACQ (6-0) </td><td> 2.50 (81) <italic>1.39</italic> </td><td> 1.41* (96) <italic>1.18</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>BMI</td><td> 30.75 (103) <italic>7.81</italic> </td><td> 32.53 (117) <italic>33.03</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>FEV1</td><td> 2.50 (89) <italic>0.76</italic> </td><td> 2.67 (108) <italic>0.95</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>FEV1%pred</td><td> 83.43 (89) <italic>20.38</italic> </td><td> 83.34 (110) <italic>21.53</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>Exacerbations</td><td> 2.59 (103) <italic>2.47</italic> </td><td> 1.67* (118) <italic>2.26</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>Hospital admissions</td><td> 0.35 (103) <italic>0.74</italic> </td><td> 0.26 (116) <italic>0.74</italic> </td></tr><tr><td>Daily ICS (BDP equivalent)</td><td> 878.05 (97) <italic>1015.59</italic> </td><td> 483.77* (110) <italic>773.29</italic> </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> *p<0.01

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Exeter (GB), Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Musgrove Park Hospital (GB), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI), British Lung Foundation (GB), Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (PT), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL), Svenska Örtmedicinska Institute (SE), University Clinic of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik (SI), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital (GB), Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association (SE), University of Plymouth (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.