Less is more… comparison of two repeatability protocols for diffusing capacity (DLCO).

<bold>Introduction/aims</bold> The 2017 ATS/ERS DLCO standard recommends that at least 2 acceptable measurements should be repeatable within 0,67 mmol/min/kPa (U). However, with many of our patients having ILD or PH with low DLCOs, we assumed 0,67 U (protocol B) allows for too much intra-session variability and narrowed it to 5% (protocol A). Aims of this study were to compare DLCO results between protocols A and B, the number of maneuvers needed to match the protocols criteria, and to explore potential predictors for the number of maneuvers. <bold>Methods:</bold> Data over a 2-week period in 2022 of 193 consecutive patients who performed DLCO test (following protocol A), was retrospectively collected (MEC2023-0189). DLCO, KCO and VA and the number of maneuvers were recalculated applying protocol B. We used 7% as an acceptable relative difference in DLCO between protocol A and B. <bold>Results:</bold> Mean(SD) DLCO, KCO and VA (protocol A) of all patients were resp. 5,69 U (2,18), 1,28 U/L (0,33) and 4,43 L (1,33). The mean(SD) Δ DLCO A vs. B was -0,01 U(0,09); p= 0,22. Bland-Altman analysis showed the mean relative Δ DLCO between A and B was - 0,06%, with limits of agreement at - 3,20% and 3,08%. Compared to protocol A, applying protocol B significant less patients (n=33) needed > 2 (3-5) maneuvers to match repeatability (p< 0,001, exact McNemar). In total 510 vs. 455 maneuvers were needed applying protocol A vs. B. The number of maneuvers (A) could not be predicted from age, VC, FEV1, DLCO or FEV/VC (Poisson regression). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Applying the broader ATS/ERS repeatability criteria at our laboratory will not lead to significant other DLCO results but could reduce the number of maneuvers, thus effort for the patient, time and diffusing gas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2327
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Less is more… comparison of two repeatability protocols for diffusing capacity (DLCO).

Monique Wapenaar, Ton Provily, Maartje Horstman, Leonard Seghers et al.
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Less is more… comparison of two repeatability protocols for diffusing capacity (DLCO).

Monique Wapenaar, Ton Provily, Maartje Horstman, Leonard Seghers, Minh Huynh
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction/aims</bold> The 2017 ATS/ERS DLCO standard recommends that at least 2 acceptable measurements should be repeatable within 0,67 mmol/min/kPa (U). However, with many of our patients having ILD or PH with low DLCOs, we assumed 0,67 U (protocol B) allows for too much intra-session variability and narrowed it to 5% (protocol A). Aims of this study were to compare DLCO results between protocols A and B, the number of maneuvers needed to match the protocols criteria, and to explore potential predictors for the number of maneuvers. <bold>Methods:</bold> Data over a 2-week period in 2022 of 193 consecutive patients who performed DLCO test (following protocol A), was retrospectively collected (MEC2023-0189). DLCO, KCO and VA and the number of maneuvers were recalculated applying protocol B. We used 7% as an acceptable relative difference in DLCO between protocol A and B. <bold>Results:</bold> Mean(SD) DLCO, KCO and VA (protocol A) of all patients were resp. 5,69 U (2,18), 1,28 U/L (0,33) and 4,43 L (1,33). The mean(SD) Δ DLCO A vs. B was -0,01 U(0,09); p= 0,22. Bland-Altman analysis showed the mean relative Δ DLCO between A and B was - 0,06%, with limits of agreement at - 3,20% and 3,08%. Compared to protocol A, applying protocol B significant less patients (n=33) needed > 2 (3-5) maneuvers to match repeatability (p< 0,001, exact McNemar). In total 510 vs. 455 maneuvers were needed applying protocol A vs. B. The number of maneuvers (A) could not be predicted from age, VC, FEV1, DLCO or FEV/VC (Poisson regression). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> Applying the broader ATS/ERS repeatability criteria at our laboratory will not lead to significant other DLCO results but could reduce the number of maneuvers, thus effort for the patient, time and diffusing gas.

Codarts Rotterdam (NL), Erasmus MC (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Less is more… comparison of two repeatability protocols for diffusing capacity (DLCO). — Monique Wapenaar, Ton Provily, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS