Dupilumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe asthma are more likely to meet clinical remission criteria: results from the VESTIGE trial

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Clinical remission is an emerging treatment goal in asthma and could become a gold standard for biologics. <bold>Aims and objectives:</bold> This analysis evaluated the proportion of patients meeting 4 key criteria for on-treatment clinical remission after 6 months of dupilumab. <bold>Methods:</bold> 109 individuals, 18–70 years old, as per inclusion criteria of VESTIGE (<ext-link>NCT04400318</ext-link>), with ≥1 exacerbation(s) in the previous year, pre-BD ppFEV<sub>1</sub> <80%, and blood eosinophil ≥300 cells/µL and FeNO ≥25 ppb, underwent 2:1 randomization to receive dupilumab 300 mg (n=72) or placebo (n=37) q2w for 24 weeks. Endpoints included % of patients meeting all 4 clinical remission criteria at Wk4 and 24. The 4 criteria were absence of severe asthma exacerbations during the study intervention period, absence of systemic corticosteroid use during the study intervention period, ACQ-5 score <1.5, and pre-BD ppFEV<sub>1</sub> ≥80% or improvement from BL in pre‑BD FEV<sub>1</sub> ≥100 mL. <bold>Results:</bold> By the end of the study, 38.9% of patients on dupilumab and 18.9% of patients on placebo met all 4 remission criteria (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.07, 7.47; P < 0.05, Table 1). Safety findings were consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Results suggest that patients on dupilumab are more likely to meet key clinical remission criteria after 6 months compared to patients on SOC, indicating substantial patient benefit. <bold>Table 1</bold>. <bold>Proportion of patients meeting all 4 clinical remission criteria.</bold> <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA1202/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td> <bold>Dupilumab</bold> <bold>n (%)</bold> </td><td> <bold>Placebo</bold> <bold>n (%)</bold> </td><td><bold>OR (CI)</bold></td><td><bold><italic>Nominal</italic> <italic>p</italic> value</bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Week 4</bold></td><td>20 (27.8)</td><td>6 (16.2)</td><td>2.05 (0.73, 5.78)</td><td>0.170</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Week 24</bold></td><td>28 (38.9)</td><td>7 (18.9)</td><td>2.83 (1.07, 7.47)</td><td>0.034</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <bold>Note:</bold> CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1202
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dupilumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe asthma are more likely to meet clinical remission criteria: results from the VESTIGE trial

Mario Castro, Harry Sacks, Njira Lucia Lugogo, Lucía De Prado Gómez et al.
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

Dupilumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe asthma are more likely to meet clinical remission criteria: results from the VESTIGE trial

Mario Castro, Harry Sacks, Njira Lucia Lugogo, Lucía De Prado Gómez, Alberto Papi, Juby A. Jacob‐Nara, Christopher Edward Brightling, Yamo Deniz, Celeste Porsbjerg, Cláudia Chaves Loureiro, Mei Zhang, Paul J. Rowe, Arnaud Bourdin, Xavier Soler
article en

Abstract

<bold>Introduction:</bold> Clinical remission is an emerging treatment goal in asthma and could become a gold standard for biologics. <bold>Aims and objectives:</bold> This analysis evaluated the proportion of patients meeting 4 key criteria for on-treatment clinical remission after 6 months of dupilumab. <bold>Methods:</bold> 109 individuals, 18–70 years old, as per inclusion criteria of VESTIGE (<ext-link>NCT04400318</ext-link>), with ≥1 exacerbation(s) in the previous year, pre-BD ppFEV<sub>1</sub> <80%, and blood eosinophil ≥300 cells/µL and FeNO ≥25 ppb, underwent 2:1 randomization to receive dupilumab 300 mg (n=72) or placebo (n=37) q2w for 24 weeks. Endpoints included % of patients meeting all 4 clinical remission criteria at Wk4 and 24. The 4 criteria were absence of severe asthma exacerbations during the study intervention period, absence of systemic corticosteroid use during the study intervention period, ACQ-5 score <1.5, and pre-BD ppFEV<sub>1</sub> ≥80% or improvement from BL in pre‑BD FEV<sub>1</sub> ≥100 mL. <bold>Results:</bold> By the end of the study, 38.9% of patients on dupilumab and 18.9% of patients on placebo met all 4 remission criteria (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.07, 7.47; P < 0.05, Table 1). Safety findings were consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> Results suggest that patients on dupilumab are more likely to meet key clinical remission criteria after 6 months compared to patients on SOC, indicating substantial patient benefit. <bold>Table 1</bold>. <bold>Proportion of patients meeting all 4 clinical remission criteria.</bold> <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA1202/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td> <bold>Dupilumab</bold> <bold>n (%)</bold> </td><td> <bold>Placebo</bold> <bold>n (%)</bold> </td><td><bold>OR (CI)</bold></td><td><bold><italic>Nominal</italic> <italic>p</italic> value</bold></td></tr><tr><td><bold>Week 4</bold></td><td>20 (27.8)</td><td>6 (16.2)</td><td>2.05 (0.73, 5.78)</td><td>0.170</td></tr><tr><td><bold>Week 24</bold></td><td>28 (38.9)</td><td>7 (18.9)</td><td>2.83 (1.07, 7.47)</td><td>0.034</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap> <bold>Note:</bold> CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Kansas (US), Inserm (FR), University of Ferrara (IT), University of Michigan (US), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (PT), Physiologie et Médecine Expérimentale du Coeur et des Muscles (FR), Sanofi (Spain) (ES), Sanofi (United States) (US), Progenics Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.