Variation in spirometric indices during a 16-week combined exercise training in sedentary workers: a randomized controlled trial

<bold>Background:</bold> Sedentary behavior may accelerate the age-associated decline in lung function. The impact of exercise on spirometric indices of sedentary adults and their relationship with smoking status remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal variation of spirometric indices over a 16-week combined training (CT) in middle-aged adults with sedentary jobs. <bold>Methods:</bold> Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to a 3 times/week (75 min/session), combined aerobic and resistance exercise training, or a control group. Spirometry was performed using the Spiropalm 6MWT (Cosmed, Italy) before (M1), and after 8 (M2) and 16 weeks (M3) of follow-up. Predicted values were calculated for FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, FEV<sub><sup>1</sup></sub>/FVC ratio, and FEF<sub>25-75%</sub> using prediction equations from the GLI. Latent growth curve modeling was used to estimate interindividual and intraindividual growth paths. Smoking status was considered a predictor of growth. <bold>Results:</bold> Thirty-six adults (age=53.7±6.9 years) completed the trial (n=18 in each group). Smoking had a significant effect on spirometric indices growth in both groups. The non-smokers of the exercise group had higher increases from M1 to M3 in predicted FEV<sub>1</sub>% (<italic>β</italic>=.08), FVC% (<italic>β</italic>=.22), FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio (<italic>β</italic>=.19), and FEF<sub>25-75%</sub> (<italic>β</italic>=.06) (<italic>p</italic><.05) than those who were smokers. The control group had lower growth in spirometric indices, with lower increases found in smokers compared to non-smokers for predicted FEV<sub>1</sub>% (<italic>β</italic>=-.41), FVC% (<italic>β</italic>=-.44), FEV<sub><sup>1</sup></sub>/FVC ratio (<italic>β</italic>=-.98), and FEF<sub>25-75%</sub> (<italic>β</italic>=-.52) (<italic>p</italic><.05). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> CT is an effective intervention to improve spirometric indices in sedentary workers. Non-smokers seem to obtain more benefits from training than smokers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa1603
Primary Topic
Exercise and Physiological Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation in spirometric indices during a 16-week combined exercise training in sedentary workers: a randomized controlled trial

José Pedro Ferreira, Diogo Monteiro, Ana Maria Teixeira, Fernanda M. Silva et al.
Exercise and Physiological Responses
article

Variation in spirometric indices during a 16-week combined exercise training in sedentary workers: a randomized controlled trial

José Pedro Ferreira, Diogo Monteiro, Ana Maria Teixeira, Fernanda M. Silva, Pedro Duarte‐Mendes
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Sedentary behavior may accelerate the age-associated decline in lung function. The impact of exercise on spirometric indices of sedentary adults and their relationship with smoking status remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal variation of spirometric indices over a 16-week combined training (CT) in middle-aged adults with sedentary jobs. <bold>Methods:</bold> Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to a 3 times/week (75 min/session), combined aerobic and resistance exercise training, or a control group. Spirometry was performed using the Spiropalm 6MWT (Cosmed, Italy) before (M1), and after 8 (M2) and 16 weeks (M3) of follow-up. Predicted values were calculated for FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC, FEV<sub><sup>1</sup></sub>/FVC ratio, and FEF<sub>25-75%</sub> using prediction equations from the GLI. Latent growth curve modeling was used to estimate interindividual and intraindividual growth paths. Smoking status was considered a predictor of growth. <bold>Results:</bold> Thirty-six adults (age=53.7±6.9 years) completed the trial (n=18 in each group). Smoking had a significant effect on spirometric indices growth in both groups. The non-smokers of the exercise group had higher increases from M1 to M3 in predicted FEV<sub>1</sub>% (<italic>β</italic>=.08), FVC% (<italic>β</italic>=.22), FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio (<italic>β</italic>=.19), and FEF<sub>25-75%</sub> (<italic>β</italic>=.06) (<italic>p</italic><.05) than those who were smokers. The control group had lower growth in spirometric indices, with lower increases found in smokers compared to non-smokers for predicted FEV<sub>1</sub>% (<italic>β</italic>=-.41), FVC% (<italic>β</italic>=-.44), FEV<sub><sup>1</sup></sub>/FVC ratio (<italic>β</italic>=-.98), and FEF<sub>25-75%</sub> (<italic>β</italic>=-.52) (<italic>p</italic><.05). <bold>Conclusion:</bold> CT is an effective intervention to improve spirometric indices in sedentary workers. Non-smokers seem to obtain more benefits from training than smokers.

Universidade Politécnica de Castelo Branco (PT), Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Exercise and Physiological Responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.