Peripheral blood indicators and COVID-19: an observational and Mendelian randomization study

Blood are critical for human health, underpinning multifarious physiological processes such as immune response and oxygen transport, which when impaired cause a considerable global health burden. Although recent observational studies have identified correlations between common blood clinical indicators and COVID-19, they cannot provide causal inference due to residual confounding and reverse causality. To identify indicators affecting COVID-19, we retrospectively collected the clinical data (n=2,293, aged 18–65years) about 58 indicators in the first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou medical university from 2022 to date, and revealed significant differences in 34 indicators between healthy controls and COVID-19 patients after multiple corrections. To assess the causal nature of these candidate markers for COVID‐19, we then performed Mendelian randomization (MR) and meta-analyses by integrating data (N > 2,461,591) from the COVID‐19 Host Genetic Initiative, Blood Cell Consortium, UK Biobank, and other large-scale Genome-wide association studies, and found that 6 blood indicators were causally associated with the risk of COVID‐19, five of which is consistent with our observational findings. Troponin I (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01–1.14) and platelet distribution width (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07) were significantly associated with a higher risk of COVID‐19 while hematocrit (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.98), haemoglobin concentration (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85–0.97), and neutrophil count (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89–0.99) were significantly associated with a lower risk of COVID‐19. These findings may help identify high-risk individuals and provide further direction on the management of COVID‐19.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2189
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peripheral blood indicators and COVID-19: an observational and Mendelian randomization study

Baoqing Sun, Zhenglin Chang
Epidemiology
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Peripheral blood indicators and COVID-19: an observational and Mendelian randomization study

Baoqing Sun, Zhenglin Chang
article en

Abstract

Blood are critical for human health, underpinning multifarious physiological processes such as immune response and oxygen transport, which when impaired cause a considerable global health burden. Although recent observational studies have identified correlations between common blood clinical indicators and COVID-19, they cannot provide causal inference due to residual confounding and reverse causality. To identify indicators affecting COVID-19, we retrospectively collected the clinical data (n=2,293, aged 18–65years) about 58 indicators in the first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou medical university from 2022 to date, and revealed significant differences in 34 indicators between healthy controls and COVID-19 patients after multiple corrections. To assess the causal nature of these candidate markers for COVID‐19, we then performed Mendelian randomization (MR) and meta-analyses by integrating data (N > 2,461,591) from the COVID‐19 Host Genetic Initiative, Blood Cell Consortium, UK Biobank, and other large-scale Genome-wide association studies, and found that 6 blood indicators were causally associated with the risk of COVID‐19, five of which is consistent with our observational findings. Troponin I (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01–1.14) and platelet distribution width (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07) were significantly associated with a higher risk of COVID‐19 while hematocrit (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.98), haemoglobin concentration (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85–0.97), and neutrophil count (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89–0.99) were significantly associated with a lower risk of COVID‐19. These findings may help identify high-risk individuals and provide further direction on the management of COVID‐19.

Epidemiology
Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.