Use of bronchodilators in bronchiectasis: data from EMBARC

ERS guidelines suggest the use of long-acting bronchodilators in bronchiectasis people with significant breathlessness or airway obstruction. To provide a real-world overview of bronchodilator prescription, a secondary analysis of EMBARC, a prospective observational study enrolling adults with bronchiectasis from Europe and Israel, has been conducted. Out of 16,963 patients with bronchiectasis, 8,632 (50.9%) were using long-acting beta agonists (LABA) and 4,707 (27.2%) were using long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) at baseline. 9,677 (57.0%) were using at least one bronchodilator, and two bronchodilators, with or without an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) were used by 3,764 (22.2%). When stratified by the severity of breathlessness measured by the mMRC scale or lung function, there was a clear increase in bronchodilator use in people with more severe breathlessness and airflow obstruction (both P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, ¼ of patients with mMRC score 4 were not receiving any bronchodilator treatment, and 1 in 5 patients with FEV1 < 30% predicted were not treated with bronchodilators. Most patients with severe breathlessness and low lung function were not receiving dual bronchodilator treatment. Our data suggest poor adherence to ERS guidelines on bronchodilator prescription. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2374/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>mMRC</td><td>At least one bronchodilator</td><td>Dual bronchodilators</td></tr><tr><td>0<break></break>1<break></break>2<break></break>3<break></break>4</td><td>1875 (42.3%)<break></break>3144 (56.5%)<break></break>2385 (65.3%)<break></break>1520 (69.4%)<break></break>669 (75.2%)</td><td>408 (9.2%)<break></break>1067 (19.2%)<break></break>1058 (28.9%)<break></break>803 (36.6%)<break></break>395 (44.4%)</td></tr><tr><td>Lung function</td><td>At least one bronchodilator</td><td>Dual bronchodilators</td></tr><tr><td>Airflow obstruction<break></break>No airflow obstruction</td><td>5509 (71.5%)<break></break>3437 (45.4%)</td><td>2648 (34.4%)<break></break>856 (11.3%)</td></tr><tr><td>FEV1 > 80%<break></break>50-79%<break></break>30-49%<break></break><30%</td><td>3008 (44.1%)<break></break>3573 (65.3%)<break></break>1827 (78.3%)<break></break>499 (80.7%)</td><td>675 (9.9%)<break></break>1433 (26.2%)<break></break>1049 (44.9%)<break></break>337 (54.5%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa2374
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of bronchodilators in bronchiectasis: data from EMBARC

Adam T. Hill, Francesco Blasi, Josje Altenburg, Michal Shteinberg et al.
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Use of bronchodilators in bronchiectasis: data from EMBARC

Adam T. Hill, Francesco Blasi, Josje Altenburg, Michal Shteinberg, Michael R. Loebinger, Mattia Nigro, Charles Haworth, J.S. Elborn, Felix C. Ringshausen, Eva Polverino, Katerina Dimakou, Rosario Menéndez, Pieter Goeminne, Tobias Welte, Montserrat Vendrell, James Chalmers, Anthony De Soyza, Pierre‐Régis Burgel, Stefano Aliberti, Antoní Torres, Megan Crichton, Marlène Murris, Robert Wilson, Wim Boersma
article en

Abstract

ERS guidelines suggest the use of long-acting bronchodilators in bronchiectasis people with significant breathlessness or airway obstruction. To provide a real-world overview of bronchodilator prescription, a secondary analysis of EMBARC, a prospective observational study enrolling adults with bronchiectasis from Europe and Israel, has been conducted. Out of 16,963 patients with bronchiectasis, 8,632 (50.9%) were using long-acting beta agonists (LABA) and 4,707 (27.2%) were using long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) at baseline. 9,677 (57.0%) were using at least one bronchodilator, and two bronchodilators, with or without an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) were used by 3,764 (22.2%). When stratified by the severity of breathlessness measured by the mMRC scale or lung function, there was a clear increase in bronchodilator use in people with more severe breathlessness and airflow obstruction (both P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, ¼ of patients with mMRC score 4 were not receiving any bronchodilator treatment, and 1 in 5 patients with FEV1 < 30% predicted were not treated with bronchodilators. Most patients with severe breathlessness and low lung function were not receiving dual bronchodilator treatment. Our data suggest poor adherence to ERS guidelines on bronchodilator prescription. <table-wrap><object-id>erj;64/suppl_68/PA2374/TB1</object-id><object-id>T1</object-id><object-id>TB1</object-id><table><colgroup><col></col><col></col><col></col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>mMRC</td><td>At least one bronchodilator</td><td>Dual bronchodilators</td></tr><tr><td>0<break></break>1<break></break>2<break></break>3<break></break>4</td><td>1875 (42.3%)<break></break>3144 (56.5%)<break></break>2385 (65.3%)<break></break>1520 (69.4%)<break></break>669 (75.2%)</td><td>408 (9.2%)<break></break>1067 (19.2%)<break></break>1058 (28.9%)<break></break>803 (36.6%)<break></break>395 (44.4%)</td></tr><tr><td>Lung function</td><td>At least one bronchodilator</td><td>Dual bronchodilators</td></tr><tr><td>Airflow obstruction<break></break>No airflow obstruction</td><td>5509 (71.5%)<break></break>3437 (45.4%)</td><td>2648 (34.4%)<break></break>856 (11.3%)</td></tr><tr><td>FEV1 > 80%<break></break>50-79%<break></break>30-49%<break></break><30%</td><td>3008 (44.1%)<break></break>3573 (65.3%)<break></break>1827 (78.3%)<break></break>499 (80.7%)</td><td>675 (9.9%)<break></break>1433 (26.2%)<break></break>1049 (44.9%)<break></break>337 (54.5%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>

Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Queen's University Belfast (GB), Humanitas University (IT), University of Dundee (GB), Université Paris Cité (FR), Royal Papworth Hospital (GB), Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Royal Brompton Hospital (GB), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), Carmel Medical Center (IL), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital (GB), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta (ES), Medisch Centrum Alkmaar (NL), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), AZ Sint-Lucas (BE), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES), Sotiria General Hospital (GR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.